James Wild
Impact in
-
- Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Gastroenterology top 5%
- Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Gastrointestinal motility and disorders 9
- Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments 9
-
- Pain Management and Opioid Use 4
- Co-authors
- M. Hale (12 shared papers)Tadaaki Yamada (8 shared papers)Robert T. Salzman (2 shared papers)Juan Camilo Arjona Ferreira (4 shared papers)Robert F. Reder (1 shared paper)Carol J. Fabian (1 shared paper)Paul D. Goldenheim (1 shared paper)Michael S. Roberts (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Pain Medicine (2 papers)The American Journal of Gastroenterology (2 papers)Journal of Pain Research (2 papers)Pain (1 paper)Clinical Journal of Pain (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumGermany
In The Last Decade
James Wild
15 papers receiving 525 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 287
- Gastroenterology 146
- Pharmacology 157
- Physiology 222
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 187
Countries citing papers authored by James Wild
This map shows the geographic impact of James Wild's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Wild with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Wild more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Wild
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Wild. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Wild. The network helps show where James Wild may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Wild, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 150 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 105 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 98 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 87 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 40 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 1 |
About James Wild
James Wild is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery, Physiology and Pharmacology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 557 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (9 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (9 papers), Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions (6 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (4 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers) and Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (287 citations), Gastroenterology (146 citations), Pharmacology (157 citations), Physiology (222 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (187 citations). James Wild has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Germany. Frequent co-authors include M. Hale, Tadaaki Yamada, Robert T. Salzman, Juan Camilo Arjona Ferreira, Robert F. Reder, Carol J. Fabian, Paul D. Goldenheim, Michael S. Roberts, Bernd Lange and Achim Steup. Their work appears in journals such as Pain Medicine, The American Journal of Gastroenterology, Journal of Pain Research, Pain and Clinical Journal of Pain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.