James W. Stamos

694 total citations
11 papers, 413 citations indexed

About

James W. Stamos is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, James W. Stamos has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 413 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 6 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 1 paper in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in James W. Stamos's work include Distributed systems and fault tolerance (6 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (6 papers) and Security and Verification in Computing (4 papers). James W. Stamos is often cited by papers focused on Distributed systems and fault tolerance (6 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (6 papers) and Security and Verification in Computing (4 papers). James W. Stamos collaborates with scholars based in United States. James W. Stamos's co-authors include David K. Gifford, Flaviu Cristian, Honesty C. Young, Allen Luniewski, Peter Schwarz and Raymond A. Lorie and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems and IBM Journal of Research and Development.

In The Last Decade

James W. Stamos

10 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
James W. Stamos United States	8	382	160	123	66	56	11	413
Daniel Ellard United States	13	451 1.2×	144 0.9×	138 1.1×	77 1.2×	34 0.6×	23	505
Seth J. White United States	9	458 1.2×	102 0.6×	88 0.7×	151 2.3×	106 1.9×	11	487
Michael J. Zwilling United States	7	386 1.0×	99 0.6×	69 0.6×	87 1.3×	111 2.0×	11	411
Sumeer Bhola United States	10	292 0.8×	181 1.1×	125 1.0×	45 0.7×	59 1.1×	23	409
Andrew W. Leung United States	9	446 1.2×	241 1.5×	83 0.7×	63 1.0×	25 0.4×	13	495
Peter Zabback United States	8	411 1.1×	143 0.9×	75 0.6×	84 1.3×	104 1.9×	21	445
Fernando Vélez Sweden	4	255 0.7×	112 0.7×	122 1.0×	16 0.2×	83 1.5×	8	307
David Kaminsky United States	6	246 0.6×	144 0.9×	93 0.8×	114 1.7×	24 0.4×	9	312
Manolis M. Tsangaris United States	7	224 0.6×	121 0.8×	76 0.6×	28 0.4×	85 1.5×	11	256
William R. Marczak United States	8	220 0.6×	153 1.0×	93 0.8×	43 0.7×	36 0.6×	13	301

Countries citing papers authored by James W. Stamos

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James W. Stamos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James W. Stamos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James W. Stamos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James W. Stamos

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James W. Stamos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James W. Stamos. The network helps show where James W. Stamos may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James W. Stamos

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James W. Stamos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James W. Stamos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James W. Stamos. James W. Stamos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Stamos, James W. & Flaviu Cristian. (2002). A low-cost atomic commit protocol. 66–75. 32 indexed citations

2.

Luniewski, Allen, et al.. (2002). A design for fine-grained access control in Melampus. 8. 185–189.

3.

Luniewski, Allen, et al.. (1993). The Rufus System: Information Organization for Semi-Structured Data. Very Large Data Bases. 97–107. 48 indexed citations

4.

Stamos, James W. & Flaviu Cristian. (1993). Coordinator log transaction execution protocol. Distributed and Parallel Databases. 1(4). 383–408. 31 indexed citations

5.

Stamos, James W. & Honesty C. Young. (1993). A symmetric fragment and replicate algorithm for distributed joins. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems. 4(12). 1345–1354. 36 indexed citations

6.

Luniewski, Allen, et al.. (1992). Fine-Grained Access Control in a Transactional Object-Oriented System.. 5. 199–216. 2 indexed citations

7.

Lorie, Raymond A., et al.. (1991). Exploiting database parallelism in a message-passing multiprocessor. IBM Journal of Research and Development. 35(5.6). 681–695. 21 indexed citations

8.

Stamos, James W. & David K. Gifford. (1990). Remote evaluation. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems. 12(4). 537–564. 132 indexed citations

9.

Stamos, James W. & David K. Gifford. (1990). Implementing remote evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 16(7). 710–722. 45 indexed citations

10.

Stamos, James W., et al.. (1984). Proposal for a Small Scheme Implementation. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 2 indexed citations

11.

Stamos, James W.. (1984). Static grouping of small objects to enhance performance of a paged virtual memory. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems. 2(2). 155–180. 64 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact