James W. Peck

600 citations
16 papers · 457 indexed · h-index 11

James W. Peck

15 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers

James W. Peck
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 427
  • Aquatic Science 164
  • Ecology 301
  • Global and Planetary Change 143
  • Physiology 15
Replace Bruce L. Swanson with:
Bruce L. Swanson United States
Michael L. Toneys United States
Wayne R. MacCallum Canada
Cynthia M. Tomcko United States
Joseph H. Elrod United States
W. Van Winkle United States
C. D. Strange United Kingdom
Gaylord R. Alexander United States
Jason L. Vogel United States
Jeffrey T. Tyson United States
James W. Peck relative to Bruce L. Swanson United States Bruce L. Swanson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Bruce L. Swanson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James W. Peck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James W. Peck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James W. Peck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James W. Peck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James W. Peck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James W. Peck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James W. Peck. The network helps show where James W. Peck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 19 scholars most cited alongside James W. Peck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James W. Peck Line = papers co-authored together James W. Peck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1
FISH-COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES FOR LAKE SUPERIOR
200358
2 20019
3
Population Dynamics of Juvenile Steelhead and Coho Salmon in Michigan’s Lake Superior Tributaries, 1982-97
20012
4
A Survey of Sport Fishing in Lake Superior Waters at Isle Royale, Michigan, 1998
20000
5 199925
6
Contribution of Hatchery Fish to Chinook Salmon Populations and Sport Harvest in Michigan Waters of Lake Superior, 1990-94
19971
7 199511
8 199516
9 1995167
10 199535
11 198815
12 198655
13 198421
14 198224
15 19745
16 197013

About James W. Peck

James W. Peck is a scholar working on Aquatic Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Water Science and Technology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 457 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (15 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (10 papers), Water Quality and Resources Studies (5 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (4 papers), Marine and fisheries research (3 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (2 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (1 paper) and Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (427 citations), Aquatic Science (164 citations) and Ecology (301 citations). James W. Peck has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Wayne R. MacCallum, Stephen T. Schram, Donald R. Schreiner, Randy L. Eshenroder, James H. Selgeby, Charles R. Bronte, Michael J. Hansen, Gary L. Curtis, Robert J. Young and Mary K. Burnham‐Curtis. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Journal of Great Lakes Research and North American Journal of Fisheries Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026