James Stanger

1.4k citations
29 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

James Stanger

28 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

James Stanger
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Reproductive Medicine 906
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 887
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 367
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 56
  • Immunology 151
Replace Anne Lis Mikkelsen with:
Anne Lis Mikkelsen Denmark
Ida Guzman United States
Ronny Janssens Belgium
Christine A. Kirby Australia
Franco Lisi Italy
Joanne Gunby Canada
Waldemar Kuczyński Poland
Jan Gerris Belgium
Per Sundström Sweden
Laëtitia Hesters France
James Stanger relative to Anne Lis Mikkelsen Denmark Anne Lis Mikkelsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Anne Lis Mikkelsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Stanger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Stanger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Stanger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Stanger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Stanger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Stanger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Stanger. The network helps show where James Stanger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Stanger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Stanger Line = papers co-authored together James Stanger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1985295
2 2015113
3 198492
4 201064
5 201059
6 201148
7 198439
8 201737
9 200135
10 198532
11 199131
12 198429
13 198428
14 198427
15 201126
16 201626
17 201726
18 201320
19 198520
20 198518

About James Stanger

James Stanger is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Immunology and Genetics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (19 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (18 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (10 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (9 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (7 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (3 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (2 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (906 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (887 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (367 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (56 citations) and Immunology (151 citations). James Stanger has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John L. Yovich, Peter M Hinchliffe, Jason Conceicao, Ghanim Almahbobi, Kevin N. Keane, Jeanne M. Yovich, Robert Woolcott, Yee Leung, Arun Dharmarajan and Frank Arfuso. Their work appears in journals such as Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Human Reproduction, Fertility and Sterility, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact