James S. Foster

3.8k total citations
66 papers, 3.1k citations indexed

About

James S. Foster is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, James S. Foster has authored 66 papers receiving a total of 3.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 45 papers in Molecular Biology, 29 papers in Oncology and 13 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in James S. Foster's work include Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes (23 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (15 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (9 papers). James S. Foster is often cited by papers focused on Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes (23 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (15 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (9 papers). James S. Foster collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Japan. James S. Foster's co-authors include Jay Wimalasena, Antonín Bukovský, Donald C. Henley, Anders Ström, Jan-Ακε Gustafsson, Johan Hartman, Silke Kietz, Hidenori Ichijo, Tzu‐Hao Wang and Tito Fojo and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Circulation.

In The Last Decade

James S. Foster

62 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

James S. Foster
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Molecular Biology 1.5k
  • Genetics 927
  • Oncology 883
  • Cancer Research 306
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 270
Replace Helga M. Ögmundsdóttir with:
Helga M. Ögmundsdóttir Iceland
Brent W. Zanke Canada
Saburo Onishi Japan
Sandra Rodríguez Spain
Donatella Tramontano Italy
Claire M. Perks United Kingdom
Giuseppe Carruba Italy
Bruce W. Eckloff United States
Harriet O. Smith United States
Michael P. Caulfield United States
Helga M. Ögmundsdóttir Iceland View profile →
Citations per field, relative to James S. Foster
James S. Foster · 1×
Citations per year, relative to James S. Foster
James S. Foster · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by James S. Foster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James S. Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James S. Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James S. Foster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James S. Foster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James S. Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James S. Foster. The network helps show where James S. Foster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James S. Foster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James S. Foster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James S. Foster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James S. Foster. James S. Foster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 2
2 1
3 21
4 28
5 10
6 8
7 64
8 26
9 20
10 52
11 450
12 84
13 56
14 83
15 167
16 22
17 325
18 12
19 11
20 21

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026