James Riccio
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Employment and Welfare Studies
- Homelessness and Social Issues
Papers in
-
- Employment and Welfare Studies 11
-
- Housing Market and Economics 7
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality 6
- Co-authors
- Howard S. Bloom (8 shared papers)Carolyn J. Hill (2 shared papers)Nandita Verma (8 shared papers)Cynthia Miller (10 shared papers)Nadine Dechausay (3 shared papers)Yeheskel Hasenfeld (1 shared paper)Johanna Walter (3 shared papers)Daniel Friedlander (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (1 paper)Evaluation Review (1 paper)Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (1 paper)Social Service Review (1 paper)Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIndia
In The Last Decade
James Riccio
43 papers receiving 479 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Gender Studies 156
- General Health Professions 223
- Public Administration 34
- Safety Research 65
- Statistics and Probability 61
Countries citing papers authored by James Riccio
This map shows the geographic impact of James Riccio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Riccio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Riccio more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Riccio
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Riccio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Riccio. The network helps show where James Riccio may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Riccio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 109 | |
| 2 | Toward Reduced Poverty Across Generations: Early Findings from New York City’s Conditional Cash Transfer Program | 2010 | 64 |
| 3 | Conditional Cash Transfers in New York City: The Continuing Story of the Opportunity NYC-Family Rewards Demonstration. | 2013 | 40 |
| 4 | 2018 | 37 | |
| 5 | Mobilizing Public Housing Communities for Work: Origins and Early Accomplishments of the Jobs-Plus Demonstration. | 1999 | 31 |
| 6 | 2011 | 27 | |
| 7 | Promoting Work in Public Housing. The Effectiveness of Jobs-Plus. Final Report. | 2005 | 26 |
| 8 | 1996 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 24 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 24 | |
| 11 | Building New Partnerships for Employment: Collaboration among Agencies and Public Housing Residents in the Jobs-Plus Demonstration. | 2001 | 21 |
| 12 | Implementation and second-year impacts for lone parents in the UK Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) demonstration | 2008 | 19 |
| 13 | 2002 | 18 | |
| 14 | Modeling the Performance of Welfare-to-Work Programs: The Effects of Program Management and Services, Economic Environment, and Client Characteristics. MDRC Working Papers on Research Methodology. | 2001 | 16 |
| 15 | GAIN: Program Strategies, Participation Patterns, and First-Year Impacts in Six Counties. California's Greater Avenues for Independence Program. | 1992 | 14 |
| 16 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 17 | Making Work Pay for Public Housing Residents Financial-Incentive Designs at Six Jobs-Plus Demonstration Sites | 2002 | 12 |
| 18 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 19 | Designing a demonstration project: an employment, retention and advancement demonstration for Great Britain. 2nd edition | 2004 | 10 |
| 20 | Extending the Reach of Randomized Social Experiments: New Directions in Evaluations of American Welfare-to-Work and Employment Initiatives. MDRC Working Papers on Research Methodology. | 2001 | 9 |
About James Riccio
James Riccio is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Finance, having authored 45 papers that have together received 640 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (15 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (11 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (11 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (7 papers), Housing Market and Economics (7 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (6 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (3 papers) and Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (156 citations), General Health Professions (223 citations), Public Administration (34 citations), Safety Research (65 citations) and Statistics and Probability (61 citations). James Riccio has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Howard S. Bloom, Carolyn J. Hill, Nandita Verma, Cynthia Miller, Nadine Dechausay, Yeheskel Hasenfeld, Johanna Walter, Daniel Friedlander, Richard Dorsett and Sandra Vegeris. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Evaluation Review, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Social Service Review and Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.