James Riccio

890 total citations
45 papers, 638 citations indexed

About

James Riccio is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, James Riccio has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 638 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in General Health Professions, 16 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 15 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in James Riccio's work include Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (15 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (11 papers) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (11 papers). James Riccio is often cited by papers focused on Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (15 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (11 papers) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (11 papers). James Riccio collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. James Riccio's co-authors include Howard S. Bloom, Carolyn J. Hill, Cynthia Miller, Nandita Verma, Nadine Dechausay, Yeheskel Hasenfeld, Daniel Friedlander, Richard Dorsett, Sandra Vegeris and Kathryn Ray and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Health Affairs and Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society).

In The Last Decade

James Riccio

42 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James Riccio United States 15 254 204 182 168 131 45 638
Richard Dorsett United Kingdom 13 209 0.8× 197 1.0× 253 1.4× 101 0.6× 96 0.7× 72 617
Laura R. Peck United States 14 183 0.7× 289 1.4× 92 0.5× 117 0.7× 150 1.1× 62 688
Richard Hendra United States 12 202 0.8× 185 0.9× 139 0.8× 210 1.3× 83 0.6× 30 582
Dónal O’Neill Ireland 15 238 0.9× 209 1.0× 473 2.6× 74 0.4× 127 1.0× 54 852
Daniela Vuri Italy 14 171 0.7× 300 1.5× 357 2.0× 221 1.3× 104 0.8× 50 899
Robinson G. Hollister United States 10 126 0.5× 94 0.5× 141 0.8× 73 0.4× 122 0.9× 28 465
Thomas Fraker United States 13 315 1.2× 199 1.0× 271 1.5× 367 2.2× 85 0.6× 27 820
Margherita Fort Italy 11 201 0.8× 373 1.8× 166 0.9× 119 0.7× 149 1.1× 39 847
Nandita Verma United States 12 195 0.8× 234 1.1× 128 0.7× 193 1.1× 86 0.7× 28 518
Sheena McConnell United States 10 85 0.3× 132 0.6× 152 0.8× 75 0.4× 91 0.7× 25 477

Countries citing papers authored by James Riccio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Riccio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Riccio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Riccio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Riccio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Riccio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Riccio. The network helps show where James Riccio may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Riccio

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Riccio. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Riccio based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Riccio. James Riccio is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Riccio, James, et al.. (2020). Executive Skills Coaching Plus Incentives in a Workforce Program: Introducing the MyGoals Demonstration.. MDRC. 1 indexed citations
2.
Courtin, Émilie, Peter Muennig, Nandita Verma, et al.. (2018). Conditional Cash Transfers And Health Of Low-Income Families In The US: Evaluating The Family Rewards Experiment. Health Affairs. 37(3). 438–446. 37 indexed citations
3.
Riccio, James, et al.. (2017). Reducing Work Disincentives in the Housing Choice Voucher Program: Rent Reform Demonstration Baseline Report. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
4.
Riccio, James & Cynthia Miller. (2016). New York City's First Conditional Cash Transfer Program: What Worked, What Didn't. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
5.
Riccio, James, et al.. (2013). Conditional Cash Transfers in New York City: The Continuing Story of the Opportunity NYC-Family Rewards Demonstration.. MDRC. 40 indexed citations
6.
Miller, Cynthia & James Riccio. (2011). Toward Reducing Poverty across Generations: Early Findings from New York City's Conditional Cash Transfer Program.. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 4 indexed citations
7.
Riccio, James, et al.. (2010). Toward Reduced Poverty Across Generations: Early Findings from New York City’s Conditional Cash Transfer Program. SSRN Electronic Journal. 64 indexed citations
8.
Riccio, James. (2010). Sustained Earnings Gains for Residents in a Public Housing Jobs Program: Seven-Year Findings from the Jobs-Plus Demonstration. Policy Brief.. MDRC. 6 indexed citations
9.
Riccio, James, Helen Bewley, Verity Campbell‐Barr, et al.. (2008). Implementation and second-year impacts for lone parents in the UK Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) demonstration. WestminsterResearch (University of Westminster). 19 indexed citations
10.
Miller, Cynthia, Helen Bewley, Verity Campbell‐Barr, et al.. (2008). Implementation and second-year impacts for New Deal 25 Plus customers in the Uk Employment Retention and Advancement (era) demonstration. Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London). 8 indexed citations
11.
Dorsett, Richard, Verity Campbell‐Barr, Gayle Hamilton, et al.. (2007). Implementation and first-year impacts of the UK Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) demonstration. WestminsterResearch (University of Westminster). 8 indexed citations
12.
13.
Bloom, Howard S., et al.. (2005). Promoting Work in Public Housing. The Effectiveness of Jobs-Plus. Final Report.. MDRC. 26 indexed citations
14.
Bloom, Howard S., Carolyn J. Hill, & James Riccio. (2003). Linking program implementation and effectiveness: Lessons from a pooled sample of welfare‐to‐work experiments. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 22(4). 551–575. 107 indexed citations
15.
Riccio, James, et al.. (1999). A Review of US and European Literature on the Microeconomic Effects of Labour Market Programmes for Young People. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique). 8 indexed citations
16.
Riccio, James & Jody Fitzpatrick. (1997). MDRC's Evaluation of GAIN: A Summary; Dialogue with James Riccio.. Evaluation Practice. 18(3). 1 indexed citations
17.
Riccio, James & Yeheskel Hasenfeld. (1996). Enforcing a Participation Mandate in a Welfare-to-Work Program. Social Service Review. 70(4). 516–542. 26 indexed citations
18.
Martinson, Karin & James Riccio. (1989). GAIN: Child Care in a Welfare Employment Initiative. California's Greater Avenues for Independence Program.. 1 indexed citations
19.
Quint, Janet & James Riccio. (1985). The Challenge of Serving Pregnant and Parenting Teens. Lessons from Project Redirection.. 5 indexed citations
20.
Riccio, James & Marilyn Price. (1984). A Transitional Employment Strategy for the Mentally Retarded: The Final STETS Implementation Report.. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026