James Redmore

690 total citations
7 papers, 408 citations indexed

About

James Redmore is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Applied Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, James Redmore has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 408 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in General Health Professions, 4 papers in Applied Psychology and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in James Redmore's work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers). James Redmore is often cited by papers focused on Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers). James Redmore collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. James Redmore's co-authors include Matthew Hickman, David Crane, Fiona Beyer, Claire Garnett, C R Muirhead, Eileen Kaner, Frank de Vocht, Jamie Brown, Susan Michie and Amy O’Donnell and has published in prestigious journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, The British Journal of Psychiatry and BMC Public Health.

In The Last Decade

James Redmore

7 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
James Redmore United Kingdom	6	207	182	152	66	66	7	408
Lex Lemmers Netherlands	12	222 1.1×	180 1.0×	297 2.0×	76 1.2×	44 0.7×	20	446
Patrick R. Clifford United States	10	104 0.5×	196 1.1×	294 1.9×	63 1.0×	62 0.9×	17	437
Brian Greene United States	10	50 0.2×	100 0.5×	88 0.6×	82 1.2×	42 0.6×	18	328
Genevieve C. Vullo United States	6	98 0.5×	62 0.3×	123 0.8×	113 1.7×	157 2.4×	6	467
José Luis Ballvé Moreno Spain	11	88 0.4×	127 0.7×	41 0.3×	37 0.6×	53 0.8×	30	383
Shari Van Hook United States	11	67 0.3×	274 1.5×	359 2.4×	203 3.1×	99 1.5×	18	621
Jalene Herron United States	9	40 0.2×	85 0.5×	142 0.9×	48 0.7×	82 1.2×	23	262
Jennifer L. Burden United States	13	54 0.3×	189 1.0×	255 1.7×	81 1.2×	192 2.9×	22	471
Christine N. May United States	10	99 0.5×	159 0.9×	38 0.3×	85 1.3×	89 1.3×	32	412
Jane Beenstock United Kingdom	8	74 0.4×	131 0.7×	31 0.2×	32 0.5×	43 0.7×	18	299

Countries citing papers authored by James Redmore

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Redmore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Redmore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Redmore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Redmore

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Redmore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Redmore. The network helps show where James Redmore may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Redmore

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Redmore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Redmore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Redmore. James Redmore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

Palmer, Jennifer C, E. Caitlin Lloyd, Deborah M Caldwell, et al.. (2022). Individual-, family- and school-based interventions to prevent multiple risk behaviours relating to alcohol, tobacco and drug use in young people aged 8-25 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 22(1). 1111–1111. 7 indexed citations

Garnett, Claire, David Crane, Jamie Brown, et al.. (2018). Reported Theory Use by Digital Interventions for Hazardous and Harmful Alcohol Consumption, and Association With Effectiveness: Meta-Regression. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 20(2). e69–e69. 30 indexed citations

Garnett, Claire, David Crane, Jamie Brown, et al.. (2018). Behavior Change Techniques Used in Digital Behavior Change Interventions to Reduce Excessive Alcohol Consumption: A Meta-regression. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 52(6). 530–543. 43 indexed citations

MacArthur, Georgina J, Deborah M Caldwell, James Redmore, et al.. (2018). Individual-, family-, and school-level interventions targeting multiple risk behaviours in young people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018(10). CD009927–CD009927. 97 indexed citations

Garnett, Claire, David Crane, Eileen Kaner, et al.. (2017). Reported theory use by digital alcohol interventions and association with effectiveness: meta-regression. UCL Discovery (University College London). 1 indexed citations

Kaner, Eileen, Fiona Beyer, Claire Garnett, et al.. (2017). Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community-dwelling populations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017(9). CD011479–CD011479. 222 indexed citations

Redmore, James, Ruth Kipping, Adam Trickey, Margaret May, & David Gunnell. (2016). Analysis of trends in adolescent suicides and accidental deaths in England and Wales, 1972–2011. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 209(4). 327–333. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact