James Redmore
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
-
- Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Papers in
-
- Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes 2
-
- Health Policy Implementation Science 1
- Community Health and Development 1
- Co-authors
- Matthew Hickman (6 shared papers)Susan Michie (3 shared papers)Claire Garnett (4 shared papers)Eileen Kaner (4 shared papers)David Crane (4 shared papers)Frank de Vocht (4 shared papers)Jamie Brown (3 shared papers)Fiona Beyer (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2 papers)Journal of Medical Internet Research (1 paper)Annals of Behavioral Medicine (1 paper)The British Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)BMC Public Health (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
James Redmore
7 papers receiving 416 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Applied Psychology 72
- Epidemiology 136
- General Health Professions 73
- Clinical Psychology 44
- Speech and Hearing 11
Countries citing papers authored by James Redmore
This map shows the geographic impact of James Redmore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Redmore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Redmore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Redmore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Redmore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Redmore. The network helps show where James Redmore may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Redmore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 226 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 101 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 7 | Reported theory use by digital alcohol interventions and association with effectiveness: meta-regression | 2017 | 1 |
About James Redmore
James Redmore is a scholar working on Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 7 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Community Health and Development (1 paper) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (72 citations), Epidemiology (136 citations), General Health Professions (73 citations), Clinical Psychology (44 citations) and Speech and Hearing (11 citations). James Redmore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Matthew Hickman, Susan Michie, Claire Garnett, Eileen Kaner, David Crane, Frank de Vocht, Jamie Brown, Fiona Beyer, C R Muirhead and Gregory Maniatopoulos. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Annals of Behavioral Medicine, The British Journal of Psychiatry and BMC Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.