James Rachels

3.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
49 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

James Rachels is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, James Rachels has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 7 papers in General Health Professions and 7 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in James Rachels's work include Ethics in medical practice (7 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (5 papers). James Rachels is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in medical practice (7 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (5 papers). James Rachels collaborates with scholars based in United States. James Rachels's co-authors include William Ruddick, Stuart Rachels, ROBERT L. ARRINGTON, David E. Cooper, Frank A. Tillman, Philippa Foot and Carl M. Kjellstrand and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology and The Journal of Philosophy.

In The Last Decade

James Rachels

43 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Active and Passive Euthanasia 1975 2026 1992 2009 1975 100 200 300

Peers

James Rachels
Margaret Urban Walker United States
Alan Gewirth United States
Lawrence Blum United States
Philippa Foot United States
Stanley Hauerwas United States
Rosemarie Tong United States
Terence Lovat Australia
Diana Tietjens Meyers United States
Т. М. Scanlon United States
Margaret Urban Walker United States
James Rachels
Citations per year, relative to James Rachels James Rachels (= 1×) peers Margaret Urban Walker

Countries citing papers authored by James Rachels

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Rachels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Rachels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Rachels more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Rachels

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Rachels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Rachels. The network helps show where James Rachels may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Rachels

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Rachels. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Rachels based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Rachels. James Rachels is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rachels, James & Stuart Rachels. (2004). Problems from philosophy. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations
2.
Rachels, James. (2002). "Moral Philosophy as a Subversive Activity". logos. 5(1). 160–163. 6 indexed citations
3.
Rachels, James. (1998). Theories about how we should live. Oxford University Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations
4.
Cooper, David E., ROBERT L. ARRINGTON, & James Rachels. (1998). Ethics : the classic readings. 5 indexed citations
5.
Rachels, James. (1998). The Principle of Agency. Bioethics. 12(2). 150–161. 2 indexed citations
6.
Rachels, James. (1992). When philosophers shoot from the hip. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 45(7). 799–801. 3 indexed citations
7.
Rachels, James. (1990). Kantian theory: the idea of human dignity. Oxford University Press eBooks. 45–49. 2 indexed citations
8.
Rachels, James. (1990). Created from Animals. 117 indexed citations
9.
Rachels, James. (1987). A REPORT FROM AMERICA: BABY M. Bioethics. 1(4). 357–365. 2 indexed citations
10.
Rachels, James. (1987). Darwin, Species, and Morality. The Monist. 70(1). 98–113. 10 indexed citations
11.
Rachels, James. (1984). Chess as Art: Reflections on Richard Reti. SUNY Digital Repository Support (State University of New York System). 15(1). 7. 1 indexed citations
12.
Rachels, James. (1981). Can Ethics Provide Answers?. PubMed. 10(3). 1–30. 16 indexed citations
13.
Rachels, James, et al.. (1979). Case Studies in Bioethics: Active Euthanasia with Parental Consent. The Hastings Center Report. 9(5). 19–19. 2 indexed citations
14.
Rachels, James, et al.. (1978). Response to "An overview of the scientist's responsibilities: comments by an ethicist". PubMed. 14(5). 379–401. 3 indexed citations
15.
Rachels, James. (1976). Understanding moral philosophy. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 2 indexed citations
16.
Rachels, James. (1975). Why privacy is important. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 4(4). 181 indexed citations
17.
Rachels, James. (1975). Active and Passive Euthanasia. New England Journal of Medicine. 292(2). 78–80. 378 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Rachels, James. (1970). On moral absolutism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 48(3). 338–353. 1 indexed citations
19.
Rachels, James. (1969). On liking. Analysis. 29(4). 143–144. 1 indexed citations
20.
Rachels, James. (1968). Wants, Reasons, and Justifications. The Philosophical Quarterly. 18(73). 299–299.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026