James R. Carey

4.1k total citations
70 papers, 3.3k citations indexed

About

James R. Carey is a scholar working on Neurology, Rehabilitation and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, James R. Carey has authored 70 papers receiving a total of 3.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Neurology, 26 papers in Rehabilitation and 26 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in James R. Carey's work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (29 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (26 papers) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (17 papers). James R. Carey is often cited by papers focused on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (29 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (26 papers) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (17 papers). James R. Carey collaborates with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Canada. James R. Carey's co-authors include Teresa J. Kimberley, Edward J. Auerbach, Scott M. Lewis, Ela Bhatt, Kâmil Uǧurbil, Peter Rundquist, Jenn‐Shing Chen, Álvaro Pascual‐Leone, Avijit Sen and Scott Lewis and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Neuroscience and Biomaterials.

In The Last Decade

James R. Carey

69 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James R. Carey United States 33 1.2k 1.1k 1.0k 886 507 70 3.3k
Marco Bove Italy 39 363 0.3× 707 0.7× 796 0.8× 2.0k 2.3× 817 1.6× 171 4.4k
A.T. Barker United Kingdom 22 471 0.4× 1.2k 1.2× 2.8k 2.7× 1.8k 2.0× 507 1.0× 41 4.7k
Chia‐Ling Chen Taiwan 37 1.8k 1.6× 688 0.6× 401 0.4× 430 0.5× 997 2.0× 167 4.5k
Mario Tombini Italy 34 545 0.5× 756 0.7× 1.1k 1.1× 2.1k 2.4× 566 1.1× 115 4.1k
Masashi Hamada Japan 36 383 0.3× 1.3k 1.2× 3.5k 3.4× 2.1k 2.4× 1.0k 2.1× 192 5.4k
Shahid Bashir Saudi Arabia 26 310 0.3× 285 0.3× 1.0k 1.0× 1.0k 1.1× 262 0.5× 229 2.8k
Isabelle Loubinoux France 33 1.3k 1.1× 732 0.7× 1.5k 1.5× 1.1k 1.3× 788 1.6× 83 4.1k
Janine Reis Germany 28 558 0.5× 1.2k 1.2× 4.0k 3.8× 2.8k 3.1× 574 1.1× 55 5.4k
Chris M. Gregory United States 27 714 0.6× 1.4k 1.3× 204 0.2× 358 0.4× 131 0.3× 103 3.0k
A. de Haan Netherlands 53 1.1k 0.9× 3.6k 3.4× 202 0.2× 537 0.6× 230 0.5× 194 8.1k

Countries citing papers authored by James R. Carey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James R. Carey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James R. Carey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James R. Carey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James R. Carey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James R. Carey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James R. Carey. The network helps show where James R. Carey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James R. Carey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James R. Carey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James R. Carey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James R. Carey. James R. Carey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Carey, James R., Mo Chen, & Christopher Streib. (2018). Video evidence of improved hand function following repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with physical therapy in stroke: a case report. Clinical Case Reports. 6(5). 792–797. 1 indexed citations
2.
Johnson, Nessa, James R. Carey, Bradley J. Edelman, et al.. (2017). Combined rTMS and virtual reality brain–computer interface training for motor recovery after stroke. Journal of Neural Engineering. 15(1). 16009–16009. 68 indexed citations
3.
Cassidy, Jessica M., Haitao Chu, David C. Anderson, et al.. (2015). A Comparison of Primed Low-frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatments in Chronic Stroke. Brain stimulation. 8(6). 1074–1084. 31 indexed citations
4.
5.
Johnson, Matthew D., Hubert H. Lim, Théoden I. Netoff, et al.. (2013). Neuromodulation for Brain Disorders: Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 60(3). 610–624. 157 indexed citations
6.
Edwardson, Matthew A., Timothy H. Lucas, James R. Carey, & Eberhard E. Fetz. (2012). New modalities of brain stimulation for stroke rehabilitation. Experimental Brain Research. 224(3). 335–358. 82 indexed citations
7.
Plow, Ela B. & James R. Carey. (2012). Pilot fMRI investigation of representational plasticity associated with motor skill learning and its functional consequences. Brain Imaging and Behavior. 6(3). 437–453. 6 indexed citations
8.
Nowak, Dennis A., et al.. (2010). Noninvasive brain stimulation and motor recovery after stroke. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 28(4). 531–544. 49 indexed citations
9.
Bhatt, Ela, et al.. (2009). Cortical activation during finger tracking vs. ankle tracking in healthy subjects. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 27(4). 253–264. 43 indexed citations
10.
Carey, James R., et al.. (2009). A specific tumor-targeting magnetofluorescent nanoprobe for dual-modality molecular imaging. Biomaterials. 31(7). 1707–1715. 54 indexed citations
11.
Durfee, William K., James R. Carey, David J. Nuckley, & Jun Deng. (2009). Design and implementation of a home stroke telerehabilitation system. PubMed. 33. 2422–2425. 32 indexed citations
12.
Plow, Ela B., et al.. (2009). Within-limb somatotopy in primary motor cortex – revealed using fMRI. Cortex. 46(3). 310–321. 51 indexed citations
13.
Bhatt, Ela, et al.. (2007). Effect of finger tracking combined with electrical stimulation on brain reorganization and hand function in subjects with stroke. Experimental Brain Research. 182(4). 435–447. 54 indexed citations
14.
Carey, James R., Felipe Fregni, & Álvaro Pascual‐Leone. (2006). rTMS combined with motor learning training in healthy subjects. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 24(3). 191–199. 34 indexed citations
15.
Kimberley, Teresa J., et al.. (2004). Electrical stimulation driving functional improvements and cortical changes in subjects with stroke. Experimental Brain Research. 154(4). 450–460. 251 indexed citations
16.
Carey, James R., et al.. (2002). Sex differences in tracking performance in patients with Parkinson's disease. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 83(7). 972–977. 11 indexed citations
17.
Carey, James R., et al.. (2001). Erosion of Professional Behaviors in Physical Therapist Students. Journal of Physical Therapy Education. 15(3). 20–22. 13 indexed citations
18.
Carey, James R., et al.. (1998). Tracking control in the nonparetic hand of subjects with stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 79(4). 435–441. 49 indexed citations
19.
Carey, James R., Connie L. Bogard, Bradley A. King, & Vera J. Suman. (1994). Finger-Movement Tracking Scores in Healthy Subjects. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 79(1). 563–576. 30 indexed citations
20.
Carey, James R., et al.. (1989). Tracking Ability of Hemiparetic and Healthy Subjects. Physical Therapy. 69(5). 342–348. 44 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026