James P. Lodolce
- Immunology top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Cancer Research top 2%
- Oncology top 5%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Averil MaSophia ChaiDavid L. BooneMarcia ChienThemistocles DassopoulosPatrick R. BurkettRima KokaFaye Chan
- Topics
- Immune Cell Function and Interaction (8 papers)T-cell and B-cell Immunology (6 papers)NF-κB Signaling Pathways (5 papers)
- Cited by
- ImmunologyCancer ResearchOncology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James P. Lodolce
20 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Immunology 2.4k
- Molecular Biology 784
- Cancer Research 727
- Oncology 545
- Epidemiology 391
Countries citing papers authored by James P. Lodolce
This map shows the geographic impact of James P. Lodolce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James P. Lodolce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James P. Lodolce more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James P. Lodolce
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James P. Lodolce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James P. Lodolce. The network helps show where James P. Lodolce may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James P. Lodolce
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James P. Lodolce. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James P. Lodolce based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James P. Lodolce. James P. Lodolce is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 71 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 25 | |
| 6 | An Ubiquitin-like Motif in ASK1 Mediates its Association with and Inhibition of the Proteasome. | 2 |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 58 | |
| 9 | 77 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 208 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 88 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 55 | |
| 18 | 151 | |
| 19 | Failure to Regulate TNF-Induced NF-κB and Cell Death Responses in A20-Deficient Micebreakdown → | 1172 |
| 20 | IL-15 Receptor Maintains Lymphoid Homeostasis by Supporting Lymphocyte Homing and Proliferationbreakdown → | 1076 |
About James P. Lodolce
James P. Lodolce is a scholar working on Immunology, Cancer Research and Neurology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Immune Cell Function and Interaction (8 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (6 papers) and NF-κB Signaling Pathways (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology (2.4k citations), Cancer Research (727 citations) and Oncology (545 citations). James P. Lodolce has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Averil Ma, Sophia Chai, David L. Boone, Marcia Chien, David L. Boone, Themistocles Dassopoulos, Patrick R. Burkett, Rima Koka, Faye Chan and Sarah Bartulis. Their work appears in journals such as Science, The Journal of Experimental Medicine and Immunity.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.