James Nasmith

574 total citations
22 papers, 423 citations indexed

About

James Nasmith is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Emergency Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, James Nasmith has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 423 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 6 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 6 papers in Emergency Medicine. Recurrent topics in James Nasmith's work include Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (12 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (10 papers) and ECG Monitoring and Analysis (5 papers). James Nasmith is often cited by papers focused on Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (12 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (10 papers) and ECG Monitoring and Analysis (5 papers). James Nasmith collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Hungary. James Nasmith's co-authors include Peter Bogaty, Simon Kouz, Réginald Nadeau, Thao Huynh, Pierre Théroux, Jean G. Diodati, Merril L. Knudtson, Louis Roy, Robert E. Dupuis and Anthony Fung and has published in prestigious journals such as Circulation, Annals of Internal Medicine and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

James Nasmith

22 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James Nasmith Canada 10 371 131 123 56 44 22 423
M Metcalfe United Kingdom 12 350 0.9× 195 1.5× 84 0.7× 27 0.5× 21 0.5× 30 526
John T. Rivers Australia 8 294 0.8× 172 1.3× 107 0.9× 32 0.6× 11 0.3× 14 390
Maciej Karcz Poland 10 242 0.7× 70 0.5× 107 0.9× 29 0.5× 15 0.3× 44 309
José L. López-Sendón Spain 6 355 1.0× 141 1.1× 151 1.2× 53 0.9× 22 0.5× 12 395
Lukas Langenbrink Germany 6 446 1.2× 279 2.1× 192 1.6× 52 0.9× 9 0.2× 9 530
R. Afzal United Kingdom 6 361 1.0× 59 0.5× 112 0.9× 133 2.4× 12 0.3× 7 405
Jongmin Hwang South Korea 11 283 0.8× 92 0.7× 116 0.9× 19 0.3× 16 0.4× 46 382
Hans W. Louwerenburg Netherlands 10 345 0.9× 256 2.0× 278 2.3× 84 1.5× 11 0.3× 17 538
Gregory Gabliani United States 13 381 1.0× 369 2.8× 287 2.3× 25 0.4× 30 0.7× 23 584
Francis Stammen Belgium 9 183 0.5× 91 0.7× 109 0.9× 43 0.8× 10 0.2× 21 250

Countries citing papers authored by James Nasmith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Nasmith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Nasmith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Nasmith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Nasmith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Nasmith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Nasmith. The network helps show where James Nasmith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Nasmith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Nasmith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Nasmith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Nasmith. James Nasmith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lambert, Laurie, James M. Brophy, Normand Racine, et al.. (2016). Outcomes of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Receiving and Not Receiving Reperfusion Therapy: The Importance of Examining All Patients. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 32(11). 1325.e11–1325.e18. 9 indexed citations
2.
Bogaty, Peter, Philippe L. L’Allier, Eli Segal, et al.. (2015). Clinical Profiles Related to Timing of Death, Including In-Hospital Deaths Before Admission, in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. The American Journal of Cardiology. 117(3). 347–352. 2 indexed citations
3.
Boothroyd, Lucy J., Laurie Lambert, Eli Segal, et al.. (2014). Comparison of Outcomes of Ambulance Users and Nonusers in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction. The American Journal of Cardiology. 114(9). 1289–1294. 25 indexed citations
5.
Lambert, Laurie, Kevin A. Brown, Lucy J. Boothroyd, et al.. (2014). Transfer of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circulation. 129(25). 2653–2660. 21 indexed citations
6.
Boothroyd, Lucy J., Eli Segal, Peter Bogaty, et al.. (2013). Information on Myocardial Ischemia and Arrhythmias Added by Prehospital Electrocardiograms. Prehospital Emergency Care. 17(2). 187–192. 6 indexed citations
8.
Lear, Scott A., et al.. (2010). Rapid Access to Cardiology Expertise: An Innovative Program to Provide Telephone Support for Family Physicians. Healthcare Quarterly. 13(4). 56–60. 3 indexed citations
10.
Diodati, Jean G., James Nasmith, R Amyot, et al.. (2006). Progressive epicardial coronary blood flow reduction fails to produce ST-segment depression at normal heart rates. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 291(6). H2889–H2896. 7 indexed citations
11.
Savard, P., Arnold Pintér, G Tremblay, et al.. (2004). Simple, quantitative body surface potential map parameters in the diagnosis of remote Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction.. PubMed. 20(11). 1109–15. 5 indexed citations
12.
Pharand, Chantal, et al.. (2003). Distinction between myocardial ischemia and postural changes in continuous ECG monitoring based on ST-segment amplitude and vector orientation--preliminary results.. PubMed. 19(9). 1023–9. 3 indexed citations
13.
Huynh, Thao, Pierre Théroux, Peter Bogaty, James Nasmith, & Susan Solymoss. (2001). Aspirin, Warfarin, or the Combination for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes and Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Circulation. 103(25). 3069–3074. 42 indexed citations
14.
LeBlanc, A.-Robert, et al.. (1997). Continuous ST-segment monitoring during coronary angioplasty using orthogonal ECG leads. Journal of Electrocardiology. 30(3). 175–187. 6 indexed citations
15.
Dubé, Bruno‐Pierre, et al.. (1996). A computer heart model incorporating anisotropic propagation. Journal of Electrocardiology. 29(2). 91–103. 17 indexed citations
16.
Goodman, Shaun G., Iqbal Bata, Albert Fung, et al.. (1996). PROTECT (Prospective Reinfarction Outcomes in the Thrombolytic Era Cardizem CD Trial): a randomized, double-blind clinical trial of diltiazem versus atenolol in secondary prophylaxis post non-Q wave myocardial infarction.. PubMed. 12(11). 1183–90. 3 indexed citations
17.
18.
Préda, István, Réginald Nadeau, P. Savard, et al.. (1994). QRS alterations in body surface potential distributions during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in single-vessel disease. Journal of Electrocardiology. 27(4). 311–322. 9 indexed citations
19.
Hamel, Denis, et al.. (1993). Body surface potential mapping of ST-segment shift in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Journal of Electrocardiology. 26(1). 43–51. 21 indexed citations
20.
Nasmith, James, et al.. (1982). Clinical Outcomes After Inferior Myocardial Infarction. Annals of Internal Medicine. 96(1). 22–26. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026