James McKelvie
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Co-authors
- Kevin S. GouldK. R. MarkhamC. A. WalkerCharles N. J. McGheeBrian H. McArdlePeter I. MackenzieDaniel PostDipika V. Patel
- Topics
- Corneal surgery and disorders (25 papers)Optical measurement and interference techniques (20 papers)Corneal Surgery and Treatments (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
James McKelvie
75 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Ophthalmology 304
- Plant Science 273
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 245
- Molecular Biology 241
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 218
Countries citing papers authored by James McKelvie
This map shows the geographic impact of James McKelvie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James McKelvie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James McKelvie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James McKelvie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James McKelvie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James McKelvie. The network helps show where James McKelvie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James McKelvie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James McKelvie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James McKelvie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James McKelvie. James McKelvie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Cataract surgery in New Zealand: access to surgery, surgical intervention rates and visual acuity. | 8 |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 82 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | SITE MEASUREMENT OF STRAIN BY A MOIRE FRINGE TECHNIQUE | 2 |
About James McKelvie
James McKelvie is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (25 papers), Optical measurement and interference techniques (20 papers) and Corneal Surgery and Treatments (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (304 citations), Biochemistry (96 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (218 citations). James McKelvie has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kevin S. Gould, K. R. Markham, C. A. Walker, Charles N. J. McGhee, Brian H. McArdle, Peter I. Mackenzie, Daniel Post, Dipika V. Patel, Fulong Dai and Stuti L. Misra. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, Optics Letters and Plant Cell & Environment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.