James Mark
Impact in
- History top 5%
- Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
- French Historical and Cultural Studies
Papers in
-
- Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics 10
- European history and politics 7
- Historical and Political Studies 1
-
- Communism, Protests, Social Movements 8
- Eastern European Communism and Reforms 2
- Historical Gender and Feminism Studies 1
- Vietnamese History and Culture Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Péter Apor (2 shared papers)Robert Gildéa (2 shared papers)Tobias A. Rupprecht (2 shared papers)Maud Anne Bracke (1 shared paper)Paul Betts (1 shared paper)Florian Bieber (1 shared paper)Idesbald Goddeeris (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Cultural and Social History (2 papers)Journal of Contemporary History (2 papers)East Central Europe (2 papers)Europe Asia Studies (1 paper)The Historical Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomHungaryBelgium
In The Last Decade
James Mark
12 papers receiving 89 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- History 34
- Space and Planetary Science 3
- Political Science and International Relations 48
- Sociology and Political Science 80
- Cultural Studies 9
Countries citing papers authored by James Mark
This map shows the geographic impact of James Mark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Mark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Mark more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Mark
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Mark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Mark. The network helps show where James Mark may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside James Mark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 0 |
About James Mark
James Mark is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 13 papers that have together received 108 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (10 papers), Communism, Protests, Social Movements (8 papers), European history and politics (7 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (4 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (2 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (1 paper), Historical and Political Studies (1 paper) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (34 citations), Space and Planetary Science (3 citations), Political Science and International Relations (48 citations), Sociology and Political Science (80 citations) and Cultural Studies (9 citations). James Mark has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hungary and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Péter Apor, Robert Gildéa, Tobias A. Rupprecht, Maud Anne Bracke, Paul Betts, Florian Bieber and Idesbald Goddeeris. Their work appears in journals such as Cultural and Social History, Journal of Contemporary History, East Central Europe, Europe Asia Studies and The Historical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.