James M. Sobel
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 2%
- Genetics top 5%
- Ecology top 5%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Douglas W. SchemskeGrace F. ChenHoward V. CornellKaustuv RoyGary G. MittelbachMatthew A. StreisfeldSean StankowskiLiza M. Holeski
- Topics
- Genetic diversity and population structure (10 papers)Plant and animal studies (9 papers)Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Ecological ModelingEcology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsNature and Landscape Conservation
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyChina
In The Last Decade
James M. Sobel
15 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.2k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 751
- Genetics 694
- Ecology 551
- Plant Science 464
Countries citing papers authored by James M. Sobel
This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Sobel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Sobel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Sobel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Sobel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Sobel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Sobel. The network helps show where James M. Sobel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James M. Sobel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James M. Sobel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James M. Sobel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James M. Sobel. James M. Sobel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 48 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 48 | |
| 9 | 179 | |
| 10 | 80 | |
| 11 | 75 | |
| 12 | 96 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | THE BIOLOGY OF SPECIATIONbreakdown → | 517 |
| 15 | Is There a Latitudinal Gradient in the Importance of Biotic Interactions?breakdown → | 922 |
About James M. Sobel
James M. Sobel is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and Ecological Modeling, having authored 15 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic diversity and population structure (10 papers), Plant and animal studies (9 papers) and Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (321 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.2k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (751 citations). James M. Sobel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and China. Frequent co-authors include Douglas W. Schemske, Grace F. Chen, Howard V. Cornell, Kaustuv Roy, Gary G. Mittelbach, Matthew A. Streisfeld, Sean Stankowski, Liza M. Holeski, Dena L. Grossenbacher and Ken Keefover‐Ring. Their work appears in journals such as The American Naturalist, Evolution and Molecular Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.