James M. Kraft

573 total citations
10 papers, 426 citations indexed

About

James M. Kraft is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, James M. Kraft has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 426 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 6 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 5 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in James M. Kraft's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (9 papers), Color Science and Applications (6 papers) and Color perception and design (5 papers). James M. Kraft is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (9 papers), Color Science and Applications (6 papers) and Color perception and design (5 papers). James M. Kraft collaborates with scholars based in United States. James M. Kraft's co-authors include David H. Brainard, John S. Werner, Michelle L. Bieber, John Krauskopf, Jason D. Forte, Peter Lennie, Jonathan W. Peirce, James M. Keller and Russell C. Eberhart and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vision Research and Journal of the Optical Society of America A.

In The Last Decade

James M. Kraft

10 papers receiving 401 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James M. Kraft United States 8 367 282 258 41 35 10 426
Shigeko Takahashi Japan 11 328 0.9× 153 0.5× 159 0.6× 33 0.8× 25 0.7× 32 387
J. Walraven Netherlands 9 391 1.1× 293 1.0× 229 0.9× 37 0.9× 50 1.4× 13 483
M. D’Zmura United States 5 446 1.2× 335 1.2× 224 0.9× 143 3.5× 67 1.9× 9 590
Marc B. Mandler United States 5 319 0.9× 173 0.6× 133 0.5× 25 0.6× 26 0.7× 8 348
Graeme R. Cole Australia 8 556 1.5× 363 1.3× 243 0.9× 41 1.0× 83 2.4× 14 613
Keizo Shinomori Japan 13 324 0.9× 153 0.5× 161 0.6× 20 0.5× 83 2.4× 48 401
Luke E. Mahon United States 8 456 1.2× 170 0.6× 148 0.6× 35 0.9× 74 2.1× 11 502
Charles M. M. de Weert Netherlands 15 649 1.8× 354 1.3× 357 1.4× 52 1.3× 29 0.8× 36 725
Eriko Miyahara United States 10 450 1.2× 247 0.9× 251 1.0× 55 1.3× 84 2.4× 17 569
Ben Craven United Kingdom 10 285 0.8× 171 0.6× 190 0.7× 27 0.7× 7 0.2× 15 347

Countries citing papers authored by James M. Kraft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Kraft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Kraft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Kraft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Kraft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Kraft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Kraft. The network helps show where James M. Kraft may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James M. Kraft

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James M. Kraft. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James M. Kraft based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James M. Kraft. James M. Kraft is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Eberhart, Russell C., et al.. (2012). Plenary Speakers and Invited Tutorial Speakers. 1–6. 1 indexed citations
2.
Kraft, James M., Jonathan W. Peirce, Jason D. Forte, John Krauskopf, & Peter Lennie. (2010). Nonlinear combination of binocular signals in macaque cortex. Journal of Vision. 1(3). 274–274. 1 indexed citations
3.
Brainard, David H., et al.. (2003). Colour Constancy: Developing Empirical Tests of Computational Models. Oxford University Press eBooks. 307–334. 23 indexed citations
4.
Forte, Jason D., Jonathan W. Peirce, James M. Kraft, John Krauskopf, & Peter Lennie. (2002). Residual eye-movements in macaque and their effects on visual responses of neurons. Visual Neuroscience. 19(1). 31–38. 16 indexed citations
5.
Kraft, James M., et al.. (2002). Surface-Illuminant Ambiguity and Color Constancy: Effects of Scene Complexity and Depth Cues. Perception. 31(2). 247–263. 59 indexed citations
6.
Kraft, James M. & John S. Werner. (1999). Aging and the saturation of colors 2 Scaling of color appearance. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 16(2). 231–231. 23 indexed citations
7.
Kraft, James M. & John S. Werner. (1999). Aging and the saturation of colors 1 Colorimetric purity discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 16(2). 223–223. 25 indexed citations
8.
Kraft, James M. & David H. Brainard. (1999). Mechanisms of color constancy under nearly natural viewing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 96(1). 307–312. 216 indexed citations
9.
Bieber, Michelle L., James M. Kraft, & John S. Werner. (1998). Effects of known variations in photopigments on L/M cone ratios estimated from luminous efficiency functions. Vision Research. 38(13). 1961–1966. 32 indexed citations
10.
Kraft, James M. & John S. Werner. (1994). Spectral efficiency across the life span: flicker photometry and brightness matching. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 11(4). 1213–1213. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026