James M. King

20 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers

James M. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 26
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 45
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 95
  • Reproductive Medicine 41
  • Pharmacology 35
Replace B. C. Bruot with:
B. C. Bruot United States
L. Enk Sweden
Z Brzezińska Poland
Benjamin Thysen United States
S.-L. Karonen Finland
Ryoji HOKAO Japan
A. Bonen Canada
Smith Gp United States
B. J. Waddell Australia
Scott T. Baum United States
James M. King relative to B. C. Bruot United States B. C. Bruot's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
B. C. Bruot · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James M. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James M. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James M. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. King. The network helps show where James M. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside James M. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James M. King Line = papers co-authored together James M. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199679
2 199447
3 197344
4 199036
5 200133
6 197931
7 198426
8 200218
9 19747
10 19776
11 20055
12 19875
13 19765
14
Effects of Competition and Mode of Fire on Physiological Responses, Psychological Stress Reactions, and Shooting Performance
19914
15 19804
16 20023
17 19842
18 19952
19 19762
20 19851

About James M. King

James M. King is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions, Behavioral Neuroscience and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 361 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Health and Performance (3 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (3 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Menstrual Health and Disorders (2 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (2 papers), Sports Performance and Training (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper) and Sports injuries and prevention (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (26 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (45 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (95 citations), Reproductive Medicine (41 citations) and Pharmacology (35 citations). James M. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Verne C. Cox, James A. Romano, N.E. Miller, John R. Crouse, P. Lerch, Stephen Edward Rees, M. Nazeem Nanjee, J.‐J. Morgenthaler, Roman Hovorka and James G. Terry. Their work appears in journals such as Physiology & Behavior, Ground Water, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, Circulation and Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact