James M. Gelb
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Oceanography top 10%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Edmund BertschingerS. P. RosenNeal KatzThomas QuinnDouglas A. AbrahamWaikwok KwongJohn N. BahcallTimothy K. Stanton
- Topics
- Neutrino Physics Research (7 papers)Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (7 papers)Underwater Acoustics Research (7 papers)
- Journals
- Physical Review LettersThe Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesPolandSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
James M. Gelb
22 papers receiving 602 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 314
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 262
- Instrumentation 92
- Oceanography 78
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 76
Countries citing papers authored by James M. Gelb
This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Gelb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Gelb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Gelb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Gelb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Gelb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Gelb. The network helps show where James M. Gelb may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James M. Gelb
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James M. Gelb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James M. Gelb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James M. Gelb. James M. Gelb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 45 | |
| 14 | 101 | |
| 15 | 30 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 94 | |
| 18 | Large Cosmological N-Body Simulations | 1 |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About James M. Gelb
James M. Gelb is a scholar working on Oceanography, Signal Processing and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 616 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neutrino Physics Research (7 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (7 papers) and Underwater Acoustics Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (92 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (314 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (262 citations). James M. Gelb has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Edmund Bertschinger, S. P. Rosen, Neal Katz, Thomas Quinn, Douglas A. Abraham, Waikwok Kwong, John N. Bahcall, Timothy K. Stanton, Dezhang Chu and Kaundinya Gopinath. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.