James L. McDonagh

24 papers receiving 868 citations

Hit Papers

A review of methods for the calculation of solution free ...20152026201820222015100200300400

Peers

James L. McDonagh
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Materials Chemistry 415
  • Organic Chemistry 248
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 214
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 185
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 169
Replace Steven V. Jerome with:
Steven V. Jerome United States
R. Skyner United Kingdom
Roberto A. Boto Spain
Caitlin C. Bannan United States
Zhengwei Peng United States
Farnaz Heidar‐Zadeh Canada
Ekaterina L. Ratkova Germany
Ramón Alain Miranda‐Quintana United States
Afshan Mohajeri Iran
Sofie Van Damme Belgium
James L. McDonagh relative to Steven V. Jerome United States Steven V. Jerome's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Steven V. Jerome · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James L. McDonagh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James L. McDonagh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James L. McDonagh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James L. McDonagh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James L. McDonagh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James L. McDonagh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James L. McDonagh. The network helps show where James L. McDonagh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James L. McDonagh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James L. McDonagh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James L. McDonagh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James L. McDonagh. James L. McDonagh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 1
3 14
4 3
5 2
6 12
7 39
8 32
9 16
10 3
11 9
12 32
13 29
14 5
15 28
16
A review of methods for the calculation of solution free energies and the modelling of systems in solutionbreakdown →
406
17 73
18 16
19 82
20 5

About James L. McDonagh

James L. McDonagh is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Information Systems and Management and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 886 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Machine Learning in Materials Science (8 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (6 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (169 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (214 citations) and Filtration and Separation (21 citations). James L. McDonagh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include John B. O. Mitchell, Tanja van Mourik, Colin R. Groom, R. Skyner, Mark A. Vincent, Paul L. A. Popelier, David Scott Palmer, Arnaldo F. Silva, Neetika Nath and Maxim V. Fedorov. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B and Chemical Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026