James L. Hedlund

41 papers receiving 626 citations

Peers

James L. Hedlund
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Clinical Psychology 193
  • Social Psychology 158
  • Epidemiology 114
  • General Health Professions 109
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 103
Replace Michael Fotheringham with:
Michael Fotheringham Australia
Ensiyeh Jamshidi Iran
Hsien‐Chang Lin United States
Kim Watts United Kingdom
Angelia M. Paschal United States
Tara McCurdie Australia
Cameron Lister United States
Ashok Chaurasia Canada
Enid Dorey New Zealand
Mehdi Mirzaei-Alavijeh Iran
James L. Hedlund relative to Michael Fotheringham Australia Michael Fotheringham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Michael Fotheringham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James L. Hedlund

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James L. Hedlund's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James L. Hedlund with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James L. Hedlund more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James L. Hedlund

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James L. Hedlund. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James L. Hedlund. The network helps show where James L. Hedlund may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James L. Hedlund

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James L. Hedlund. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James L. Hedlund based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James L. Hedlund. James L. Hedlund is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 8
2 0
3 9
4 213
5 3
6 5
7
Mental health computing: directions for research
0
8 2
9 10
10 31
11
The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ): A comprehensive review.
70
12
Some Utilization and Maintenance Issues with Mental Health Information Systems.
5
13
Computer Applications in Mental Health Management
2
14 6
15
Automated psychiatric information systems: A critical review of Missouri's Standard System of Psychiatry (SSOP).
40
16 9
17 7
18 19
19 4
20 17

About James L. Hedlund

James L. Hedlund is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Health Information Management and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 44 papers that have together received 731 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (8 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers) and Electronic Health Records Systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (85 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (85 citations) and Clinical Psychology (193 citations). James L. Hedlund has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Dong Won Cho, Richard C. Evenson, Ivan W. Sletten, Victor R. Adebimpe, Harold Altman, Barbara J. Powell, James Michael Weiss, David Davis, David F. Preusser and Ruth A. Shults. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, American Journal of Psychiatry and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026