James L. Crawford
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Ecology top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Co-authors
- Gary J. QuigleyAlexander RichFrancis J. KolpakJacques H. van BoomGijs van der MarelAndrew H.‐J. WangWilliam N. LipscombJ. W. Matthews
- Topics
- Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (3 papers)Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (2 papers)Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth AfricaJordan
In The Last Decade
James L. Crawford
17 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
- Molecular Biology 2.1k
- Materials Chemistry 463
- Ecology 218
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 195
- Organic Chemistry 157
Countries citing papers authored by James L. Crawford
This map shows the geographic impact of James L. Crawford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James L. Crawford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James L. Crawford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James L. Crawford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James L. Crawford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James L. Crawford. The network helps show where James L. Crawford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James L. Crawford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James L. Crawford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James L. Crawford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James L. Crawford. James L. Crawford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 62 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 202 | |
| 9 | 148 | |
| 10 | Molecular structure of a left-handed double helical DNA fragment at atomic resolutionbreakdown → | 1732 |
| 11 | 131 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | The Reverse Turn as a Polypeptide Conformation in Globular Proteinsbreakdown → | 213 |
| 15 | An Evaluation of a Short-Term Drug Education Program. | 25 |
| 16 | 45 | |
| 17 | 152 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About James L. Crawford
James L. Crawford is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Surfaces, Coatings and Films and Nephrology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (3 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (2.1k citations), Biochemistry (130 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (92 citations). James L. Crawford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Jordan. Frequent co-authors include Gary J. Quigley, Alexander Rich, Francis J. Kolpak, Jacques H. van Boom, Gijs van der Marel, Andrew H.‐J. Wang, William N. Lipscomb, J. W. Matthews, Hugo L. Monaco and W. N. Lipscomb. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Applied Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.