James J. Stone

1.9k total citations
75 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

James J. Stone is a scholar working on Pollution, Environmental Engineering and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, James J. Stone has authored 75 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Pollution, 16 papers in Environmental Engineering and 14 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in James J. Stone's work include Mine drainage and remediation techniques (12 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (12 papers) and Biofuel production and bioconversion (9 papers). James J. Stone is often cited by papers focused on Mine drainage and remediation techniques (12 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (12 papers) and Biofuel production and bioconversion (9 papers). James J. Stone collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and New Zealand. James J. Stone's co-authors include Heidi L. Sieverding, Sharon A. Clay, David E. Clay, Aisling D. O’Sullivan, Venkataramana Gadhamshetty, Namita Shrestha, Govinda Chilkoor, Larry D. Stetler, Jennifer L. Benning and Jorge González-Estrella and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta and Water Research.

In The Last Decade

James J. Stone

73 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
James J. Stone United States	23	343	251	233	218	211	75	1.4k
Kerry L. Sublette United States	23	345 1.0×	831 3.3×	455 2.0×	243 1.1×	151 0.7×	104	2.1k
Huijie Li China	27	282 0.8×	515 2.1×	289 1.2×	84 0.4×	369 1.7×	100	2.5k
Nikolas Hagemann Switzerland	20	274 0.8×	440 1.8×	288 1.2×	297 1.4×	206 1.0×	46	2.8k
Ruben Sakrabani United Kingdom	26	212 0.6×	369 1.5×	248 1.1×	211 1.0×	144 0.7×	107	2.3k
Han Chen China	24	263 0.8×	438 1.7×	122 0.5×	117 0.5×	216 1.0×	65	2.0k
Yinlong Xiao China	28	159 0.5×	540 2.2×	307 1.3×	301 1.4×	107 0.5×	71	2.4k
Lei Zhou China	25	266 0.8×	880 3.5×	471 2.0×	444 2.0×	140 0.7×	107	2.2k
Teresa Fuertes‐Mendizábal Spain	20	112 0.3×	281 1.1×	192 0.8×	236 1.1×	108 0.5×	32	1.9k
Long‐Jun Ding China	19	335 1.0×	489 1.9×	488 2.1×	328 1.5×	45 0.2×	38	1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by James J. Stone

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James J. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James J. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James J. Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James J. Stone

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James J. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James J. Stone. The network helps show where James J. Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James J. Stone

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James J. Stone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James J. Stone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James J. Stone. James J. Stone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Stone, James J.. (2024). Information and Iron: The Role of Espionage in the Foundation of the German Empire, 1866–1871. German History. 42(3). 334–355.

Sieverding, Heidi L., et al.. (2020). Life cycle assessment of wheat production and wheat‐based crop rotations. Journal of Environmental Quality. 49(6). 1515–1529. 20 indexed citations

Reimus, Paul W., et al.. (2018). Uncertainty and variability in laboratory derived sorption parameters of sediments from a uranium in situ recovery site. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology. 213. 28–39. 11 indexed citations

González-Estrella, Jorge, et al.. (2016). Batch anaerobic digestion of synthetic military base food waste and cardboard mixtures. Bioresource Technology. 216. 894–903. 29 indexed citations

Shrestha, Namita, et al.. (2016). Potential water resource impacts of hydraulic fracturing from unconventional oil production in the Bakken shale. Water Research. 108. 1–24. 123 indexed citations

Stone, James J.. (2015). Bismarck and the Great Game: Germany and Anglo-Russian Rivalry in Central Asia, 1871–1890. Central European History. 48(2). 151–175.

O’Sullivan, Aisling D., et al.. (2014). Life Cycle Assessment modelling of stormwater treatment systems. Journal of Environmental Management. 149. 236–244. 67 indexed citations

Stone, James J.. (2012). Bismarck Ante Portas! Germany and theSeize MaiCrisis of 1877. Diplomacy and Statecraft. 23(2). 209–235. 1 indexed citations

Stone, James J., et al.. (2011). Impact of chlortetracycline on sequencing batch reactor performance for swine manure treatment. Bioresource Technology. 102(17). 7807–7814. 14 indexed citations

10.

Stone, James J., et al.. (2011). Land application of tylosin and chlortetracycline swine manure: Impacts to soil nutrients and soil microbial community structure.. PubMed. 46(8). 752–62. 10 indexed citations

11.

Stone, James J., et al.. (2010). Life Cycle Assessment of a Modern Northern Great Plains U.S. Swine Production Facility. Environmental Engineering Science. 27(12). 1009–1018. 11 indexed citations

12.

Stone, James J., Sharon A. Clay, & Garth M. Spellman. (2010). Tylosin and chlortetracycline effects during swine manure digestion: Influence of sodium azide. Bioresource Technology. 101(24). 9515–9520. 10 indexed citations

13.

Chipps, Steven R., et al.. (2010). Influence of Physiochemical and Watershed Characteristics on Mercury Concentration in Walleye, Sander vitreus, M.. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 86(2). 163–167. 10 indexed citations

14.

Stone, James J., et al.. (2010). The War Scare of 1875: Bismarck and Europe in the Mid-1870s. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations

15.

Stone, James J., et al.. (2009). Effect of antimicrobial compounds tylosin and chlortetracycline during batch anaerobic swine manure digestion. Water Research. 43(18). 4740–4750. 101 indexed citations

16.

Stone, James J.. (2009). Aquinas on the Divine Ideas as Exemplar Causes. International Philosophical Quarterly. 49(1). 129–131. 14 indexed citations

17.

Stone, James J., et al.. (2008). Effects of Nickel and Soil Humic Acid During Biological Hematite Reduction by Shewanella putrefaciens CN32. Environmental Engineering Science. 26(4). 841–848. 3 indexed citations

18.

Burgos, William D., John M. Senko, Brian A. Dempsey, et al.. (2007). Soil Humic Acid Decreases Biological Uranium(VI) Reduction by Shewanella putrefaciens CN32. Environmental Engineering Science. 24(6). 755–761. 26 indexed citations

19.

Stone, James J., William D. Burgos, Richard A. Royer, & Brian A. Dempsey. (2006). Impact of Zinc on Biological Fe(III) and Nitrate Reduction by Shewanella putrefaciens CN32. Environmental Engineering Science. 23(4). 691–704. 15 indexed citations

20.

Stone, James J., William D. Burgos, Richard A. Royer, & Brian A. Dempsey. (2006). Zinc and Manganese Inhibition of Biological Hematite Reduction. Environmental Engineering Science. 23(5). 851–862. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact