James J. King

1.3k total citations
36 papers, 446 citations indexed

About

James J. King is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Aquatic Science. According to data from OpenAlex, James J. King has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 446 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 19 papers in Ecology and 8 papers in Aquatic Science. Recurrent topics in James J. King's work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (26 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (11 papers) and Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (8 papers). James J. King is often cited by papers focused on Fish Ecology and Management Studies (26 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (11 papers) and Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (8 papers). James J. King collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, United States and United Kingdom. James J. King's co-authors include Fiona Kelly, Hiroaki Nishiuchi, William Roche, D. P. Franzmeier, W. Kŕause, Jens Carlsson, Seán Rooney, Mary Kelly‐Quinn, Mary L. Moser and Pedro R. Almeida and has published in prestigious journals such as Soil Science Society of America Journal, Journal of Environmental Quality and Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.

In The Last Decade

James J. King

33 papers receiving 401 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James J. King Ireland 13 250 246 88 71 50 36 446
Chengcheng Zhang China 10 122 0.5× 43 0.2× 37 0.4× 29 0.4× 30 0.6× 23 323
Nobuo Ishiyama Japan 13 328 1.3× 241 1.0× 8 0.1× 34 0.5× 28 0.6× 46 467
Jeffrey D. Muehlbauer United States 12 469 1.9× 359 1.5× 52 0.6× 26 0.4× 38 0.8× 23 660
Martin Schletterer Austria 14 453 1.8× 343 1.4× 143 1.6× 46 0.6× 25 0.5× 79 666
Dana E. Weigel United States 12 274 1.1× 296 1.2× 31 0.4× 90 1.3× 201 4.0× 17 561
Nicholas Koutsikos Greece 14 174 0.7× 262 1.1× 62 0.7× 187 2.6× 32 0.6× 35 398
Fernando M. Carvajal‐Vallejos Bolivia 13 222 0.9× 488 2.0× 48 0.5× 267 3.8× 39 0.8× 31 698
Guohuan Su China 12 384 1.5× 424 1.7× 65 0.7× 168 2.4× 43 0.9× 24 683
Thomas Changeux France 11 136 0.5× 115 0.5× 19 0.2× 84 1.2× 31 0.6× 36 360

Countries citing papers authored by James J. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James J. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James J. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James J. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James J. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James J. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James J. King. The network helps show where James J. King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James J. King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James J. King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James J. King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James J. King. James J. King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Westerhoff, Rogier, R. W. McDowell, James Brasington, et al.. (2022). Towards implementation of robust monitoring technologies alongside freshwater improvement policy in Aotearoa New Zealand. Environmental Science & Policy. 132. 1–12. 10 indexed citations
3.
Moser, Mary L., et al.. (2020). Passage and freshwater habitat requirements of anadromous lampreys: Considerations for conservation and control. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 47. S147–S158. 27 indexed citations
4.
Shephard, Samuel, et al.. (2019). Length‐based assessment of larval lamprey population structure at differing spatial scales. Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 29(1). 39–46. 5 indexed citations
5.
Mulder, Monique Borgerhoff, et al.. (2019). Supporting community-based natural resource management in pastoralist societies in East Africa to achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Figshare. 1 indexed citations
6.
Barry, James, et al.. (2018). Comparison of coarse‐resolution rapid methods for assessing fish passage at riverine barriers: ICE and SNIFFER protocols. River Research and Applications. 34(9). 1168–1178. 12 indexed citations
7.
King, James J., et al.. (2018). Initial observations on feeding juvenille sea lamprey (<em>Petromyzon marinus</em> L.) in Irish lakes. Biology & Environment Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy. 118B(2). 113–113. 4 indexed citations
8.
Collins, Patrick C., John A. Finarelli, Damian Egan, et al.. (2015). An eDNA assay for Irish Petromyzon marinus and Salmo trutta and field validation in running water. Journal of Fish Biology. 87(5). 1254–1262. 35 indexed citations
9.
King, James J., et al.. (2015). River engineering works and lamprey ammocoetes; impacts, recovery, mitigation. Water and Environment Journal. 29(4). 482–488. 3 indexed citations
10.
Rooney, Seán, et al.. (2015). Behaviour of sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus L.) at man-made obstacles during upriver spawning migration: use of telemetry to assess efficacy of weir modifications for improved passage. Biology & Environment Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy. 115B(2). 125–136. 1 indexed citations
11.
Coscia, Ilaria, et al.. (2013). A species-to-be? The genetic status and colonization history of the critically endangered Killarney shad. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 69(3). 1190–1195. 9 indexed citations
12.
Nishiuchi, Hiroaki, et al.. (2012). Spatial-Temporal Daily Frequent Trip Pattern of Public Transport Passengers Using Smart Card Data. International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research. 11(1). 1–10. 49 indexed citations
13.
Coscia, Ilaria, et al.. (2010). A highly permeable species boundary between two anadromous fishes. Journal of Fish Biology. 77(5). 1137–1149. 18 indexed citations
14.
King, James J., et al.. (2010). Development and implementation of environmental protocols in river maintenance in Ireland. Water and Environment Journal. 25(3). 422–428. 2 indexed citations
15.
Kelly, Fiona, et al.. (2009). THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE: USING FISH AS A MANAGEMENT TOOL. Biology & Environment Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy. 109(3). 191–206. 12 indexed citations
16.
King, James J., et al.. (2004). The status and distribution of lamprey and shad in the Slaney and Munster Blackwater SACs. 6 indexed citations
17.
Johnston, Cliff T., et al.. (2001). Chemical Characterization of Synthetic Soil from Composting Coal Combustion and Pharmaceutical By‐Products. Journal of Environmental Quality. 30(1). 246–253. 14 indexed citations
18.
King, James J., et al.. (2000). The experimental drainage maintenance (EDM) programme: engineering and fisheries management interactions in drained Irish salmonid channels. SIL Proceedings 1922-2010. 27(3). 1532–1535. 2 indexed citations
19.
O'Grady, M. F. & James J. King. (1992). Ecological Changes over 30 Years caused by drainage of a salmonid stream, the Bunree River. Marine Institute Open Access Repository (Marine Institute). 2 indexed citations
20.
King, James J. & D. P. Franzmeier. (1980). Morphology, Hydrology, and Management of Clermont Soils. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science. 90. 416–422. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026