This map shows the geographic impact of James Geiss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Geiss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Geiss more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Geiss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Geiss. The network helps show where James Geiss may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Geiss
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Geiss.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Geiss based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James Geiss. James Geiss is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tang, Haitao, et al.. (2017). Classical Chinese. Princeton University Press eBooks.
Höppe, P., et al.. (1991). Carbon, Nitrogen and Silicon Isotopes in Small Interstellar SiC Grains from the Murchison C2 Chondrite. Meteoritics and Planetary Science. 26. 346.6 indexed citations
Kohl, J. L., Lee Hartmann, A. A. van Ballegooijen, et al.. (1989). UVCS: An Ultraviolet Coronagraph Spectrometer for SOHO. ESA Special Publication. 1104. 49.2 indexed citations
7.
Noci, G., E. Antonucci, James Geiss, et al.. (1989). `UVCS' - An ultraviolet coronograph spectrometer for Soho. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 348. 49–54.5 indexed citations
8.
Niederer, F. R., P. Eberhardt, James Geiss, & R. S. Lewis. (1985). Carbon Isotope Abundances in Murchison Residue 2C10c. Meteoritics and Planetary Science. 20. 716.8 indexed citations
9.
Eugster, O., James Geiss, & N. Grögler. (1983). Dating of Early Regolith Exposure and the Evolution of Trapped 40AR/36AR with Time. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 177–178.8 indexed citations
10.
Eugster, O., et al.. (1982). Double drive tube 74001/2: a two-stage exposure model based on noble gases, chemical abundances and predicted production rates.. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Proceedings. 12. 541.11 indexed citations
11.
Eugster, O., N. Groegler, P. Eberhardt, & James Geiss. (1980). Double drive tube 74001/2: composition of noble gases trapped 3.7 AE ago.. 2. 1565–1592.13 indexed citations
12.
Eugster, O., N. Groegler, P. Eberhardt, & James Geiss. (1979). Double drive tube 74001/2: history of the black and orange glass; determination of a pre-exposure 3.7 AE ago by 136 Xe/ 235 U dating.. 2. 1351–1379.8 indexed citations
Eugster, O., et al.. (1977). The cosmic-ray exposure history of Shorty Crater samples; the age of Shorty Crater.. 3. 3059–3082.22 indexed citations
15.
Eberhardt, P., et al.. (1976). Young and Old Ages in the Descartes Region. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 7. 233.3 indexed citations
16.
Geiss, James. (1963). Experimental Evidence on the History of Cosmic Radiation. International Cosmic Ray Conference. 3. 434.2 indexed citations
17.
Eberhardt, P., et al.. (1961). NEUTRONS IN METEORITES.72 indexed citations
18.
Geiss, James, H. Oeschger, & Philip M. Singer. (1960). RADIATION AGES OF CHONDRITES.28 indexed citations
19.
Eberhardt, P. & James Geiss. (1960). RADIOACTIVE AND STABLE ISOTOPES IN METEORITES. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.