James G. Tidball
- Molecular Biology top 0.5%
- Rehabilitation top 0.02%
- Physiology top 0.5%
- Cell Biology top 0.5%
- Surgery top 1%
- Co-authors
- Melissa J. SpencerMichelle Wehling‐HenricksS. Armando VillaltaM. WehlingBo DengHal X. NguyenYing WangBarbara A. St. Pierre
- Topics
- Muscle Physiology and Disorders (98 papers)Exercise and Physiological Responses (37 papers)Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (19 papers)
- Cited by
- RehabilitationGeneticsCell Biology
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryJournal of Clinical Investigation
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaJapan
In The Last Decade
James G. Tidball
136 papers receiving 12.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
- Molecular Biology 8.6k
- Rehabilitation 3.6k
- Physiology 3.1k
- Cell Biology 2.1k
- Surgery 1.8k
Countries citing papers authored by James G. Tidball
This map shows the geographic impact of James G. Tidball's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James G. Tidball with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James G. Tidball more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James G. Tidball
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James G. Tidball. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James G. Tidball. The network helps show where James G. Tidball may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James G. Tidball
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James G. Tidball. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James G. Tidball based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James G. Tidball. James G. Tidball is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37 | |
| 2 | 77 | |
| 3 | 64 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 305 | |
| 7 | 235 | |
| 8 | 46 | |
| 9 | 366 | |
| 10 | 50 | |
| 11 | 182 | |
| 12 | 49 | |
| 13 | 143 | |
| 14 | 37 | |
| 15 | 38 | |
| 16 | 370 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 147 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About James G. Tidball
James G. Tidball is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Cell Biology and Molecular Biology, having authored 136 papers that have together received 12.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle Physiology and Disorders (98 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (37 papers) and Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (3.6k citations), Genetics (1.4k citations) and Cell Biology (2.1k citations). James G. Tidball has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Melissa J. Spencer, Michelle Wehling‐Henricks, S. Armando Villalta, M. Wehling, Bo Deng, Hal X. Nguyen, Ying Wang, Barbara A. St. Pierre, Jérôme Frenette and Kenneth Dorshkind. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Clinical Investigation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.