James G. Smith

770 total citations
33 papers, 454 citations indexed

About

James G. Smith is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Geology and Atmospheric Science. According to data from OpenAlex, James G. Smith has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 454 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 14 papers in Geology and 13 papers in Atmospheric Science. Recurrent topics in James G. Smith's work include Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (16 papers), Geological Studies and Exploration (14 papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (13 papers). James G. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (16 papers), Geological Studies and Exploration (14 papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (13 papers). James G. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, Eritrea and United Kingdom. James G. Smith's co-authors include W. D. Ray, Edward J. Wegman, David R. Sherrod, Edwin H. McKee, Travis Hudson, E. M. MacKevett, James J. Rytuba, M. H. Podwysocki, Antonio Arribas and Charles G. Cunningham and has published in prestigious journals such as Geological Society of America Bulletin, USGS professional paper and Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences.

In The Last Decade

James G. Smith

26 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers

James G. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Geophysics 176
  • Artificial Intelligence 170
  • Geology 98
  • Atmospheric Science 55
  • Signal Processing 33
Replace Anupam Chattopadhyay with:
Anupam Chattopadhyay India
K. Veeraswamy India
Richard G. Gibson Canada
A. R. Maffei United States
K. G. Bemis United States
Umberto Tammaro Italy
Shinji Masumoto Japan
Nick Cook Australia
T. L. Logan United States
Anupam Chattopadhyay India View profile →
Citations per field, relative to James G. Smith
James G. Smith · 1×
Citations per year, relative to James G. Smith
James G. Smith · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by James G. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James G. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James G. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James G. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James G. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James G. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James G. Smith. The network helps show where James G. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James G. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James G. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James G. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James G. Smith. James G. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 17
2 0
3 48
4 30
5 0
6 107
7 15
8 24
9 2
10 6
11
Local Band Organization Of The Caribou-Eater Chipewyan
10
12 8
13 1
14 6
15
Use of machine-processable field notes in a wilderness mapping project (Granite Fiords area), southeastern Alaska
2
16 10
17 2
18 4
19 2
20 12

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026