James Foster

32 papers receiving 526 citations

Peers

James Foster
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 15
  • Pharmacology 159
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 24
  • Occupational Therapy 30
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 57
Replace Joseph Kim with:
Joseph Kim United States
Fok‐Ching Chong Taiwan
Florian Schneider Germany
José Alberto Benítez‐Andrades Spain
Matthias Gietzelt Germany
David Rügamer Germany
Christine M. Schubert Kabban United States
James Wilson United States
P. K. Raju United States
James Foster relative to Joseph Kim United States Joseph Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19×
Joseph Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Foster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Foster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Foster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Foster. The network helps show where James Foster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Foster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Foster Line = papers co-authored together James Foster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201467
2 201454
3 201637
4 201233
5 201333
6 199132
7 200530
8 199529
9
Tap: Unlocking the Mobile Economy
201727
10 199126
11 201325
12 201324
13 201819
14 199119
15 201815
16 202013
17 201512
18 201710
19 20178
20
Distributive processing for banking.
19766

About James Foster

James Foster is a scholar working on Surgery, Pharmacology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 34 papers that have together received 557 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (4 papers), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (4 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (3 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (2 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (2 papers) and Tendon Structure and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (15 citations), Pharmacology (159 citations), Energy Engineering and Power Technology (24 citations), Occupational Therapy (30 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (57 citations). James Foster has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Arun Garg, Kurt T. Hegmann, Jay Kapellusch, Eric M. Wood, Matthew S. Thiese, J. David Nightingale, Natashia Boland, Hamish Waterer, Anindya Ghose and Adam Berry. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, AIDS Education and Prevention and IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact