James Feigenbaum

35 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers

James Feigenbaum
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • General Decision Sciences 33
  • Accounting 192
  • Economics and Econometrics 254
  • Finance 84
  • Demography 76
Replace Casey Rothschild with:
Casey Rothschild United States
András Simonovits Hungary
Kurt Mitman United States
Branko Urošević Serbia
Jesús Marı́n-Solano Spain
Robert Lucas United States
Fabian Kindermann Germany
Michel Vellekoop Netherlands
Juan Pablo Rincón‐Zapatero Spain
Dominique Thon Norway
James Feigenbaum relative to Casey Rothschild United States Casey Rothschild's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Casey Rothschild · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Feigenbaum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Feigenbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Feigenbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Feigenbaum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Feigenbaum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Feigenbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Feigenbaum. The network helps show where James Feigenbaum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside James Feigenbaum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Feigenbaum Line = papers co-authored together James Feigenbaum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200747
2 200746
3 200638
4 200738
5 200330
6 200125
7 199823
8 199823
9 200819
10 201317
11 201716
12 200815
13 201213
14 20168
15 20178
16 20157
17 20046
18 20066
19 20086
20 20136

About James Feigenbaum

James Feigenbaum is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, General Health Professions and Demography, having authored 36 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (20 papers), Economic theories and models (11 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (7 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (6 papers), Global Health Care Issues (6 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (6 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers) and Housing Market and Economics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (33 citations), Accounting (192 citations), Economics and Econometrics (254 citations), Finance (84 citations) and Demography (76 citations). James Feigenbaum has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Australia. Frequent co-authors include James B. Bullard, P. Freund, Hyeon Park, Geng Li, Christopher Muller, Deirdre Bloome, Frank Caliendo and Li Geng. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Quantitative Finance, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics and Journal of Mathematical Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact