James F. Colbert

33 total papers · 854 total citations
17 papers, 585 citations indexed

About

James F. Colbert is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Nephrology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, James F. Colbert has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 585 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Epidemiology, 5 papers in Nephrology and 5 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. Recurrent topics in James F. Colbert's work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (4 papers) and Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (4 papers). James F. Colbert is often cited by papers focused on Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (4 papers) and Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (4 papers). James F. Colbert collaborates with scholars based in United States, Poland and United Kingdom. James F. Colbert's co-authors include Eric P. Schmidt, Joseph A. Hippensteel, Christophe Langouët-Astrié, Wells B. LaRivière, Adit A. Ginde, Fuming Zhang, Xiaorui Han, Robert J. Linhardt, Sarah Faubel and Ryan C. Burke and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, The Journal of Comparative Neurology and The FASEB Journal.

In The Last Decade

James F. Colbert

16 papers receiving 574 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
James F. Colbert 224 176 106 101 94 17 585
Rebecca Halbgebauer 127 0.6× 105 0.6× 99 0.9× 49 0.5× 50 0.5× 30 626
Angela Frank 119 0.5× 79 0.4× 48 0.5× 193 1.9× 157 1.7× 25 637
Jérémie Joffre 150 0.7× 122 0.7× 77 0.7× 38 0.4× 46 0.5× 29 526
Patricia A. C. Specht 67 0.3× 98 0.6× 101 1.0× 172 1.7× 114 1.2× 28 637
David M. Stepien 279 1.2× 76 0.4× 59 0.6× 25 0.2× 84 0.9× 15 640
AB Johan Groeneveld 195 0.9× 111 0.6× 121 1.1× 33 0.3× 28 0.3× 16 608
Lorenzo Labarta 310 1.4× 82 0.5× 65 0.6× 19 0.2× 46 0.5× 33 648
Justin T. Sambol 226 1.0× 171 1.0× 162 1.5× 24 0.2× 28 0.3× 26 662
Yongjie Yin 170 0.8× 76 0.4× 65 0.6× 43 0.4× 23 0.2× 21 585
José I. Gómez-Herreras 252 1.1× 157 0.9× 110 1.0× 25 0.2× 16 0.2× 27 610

Countries citing papers authored by James F. Colbert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James F. Colbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James F. Colbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James F. Colbert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James F. Colbert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James F. Colbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James F. Colbert. The network helps show where James F. Colbert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James F. Colbert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James F. Colbert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James F. Colbert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James F. Colbert. James F. Colbert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026