James E. Taylor

6.4k total citations
63 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

James E. Taylor is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, James E. Taylor has authored 63 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 45 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 24 papers in Instrumentation and 12 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in James E. Taylor's work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (42 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (24 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (19 papers). James E. Taylor is often cited by papers focused on Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (42 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (24 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (19 papers). James E. Taylor collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. James E. Taylor's co-authors include Julio F. Navarro, Richard S. Ellis, R. Massey, Christopher N. A. Willmer, Benjamin J. Weiner, Peter Eisenhardt, Kevin Bundy, Alison L. Coil, Michael C. Cooper and Christopher J. Conselice and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

James E. Taylor

54 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James E. Taylor Canada 19 1.6k 708 475 116 116 63 1.7k
Yen‐Ting Lin Taiwan 23 1.8k 1.1× 889 1.3× 342 0.7× 82 0.7× 87 0.8× 65 1.9k
B. Guiderdoni France 20 2.2k 1.4× 1.2k 1.6× 466 1.0× 118 1.0× 82 0.7× 53 2.3k
G. Covone Italy 23 1.3k 0.8× 535 0.8× 325 0.7× 57 0.5× 158 1.4× 73 1.4k
E. Semboloni Netherlands 19 1.5k 1.0× 587 0.8× 372 0.8× 68 0.6× 213 1.8× 22 1.6k
F. Stoehr Germany 12 1.5k 0.9× 623 0.9× 435 0.9× 91 0.8× 87 0.8× 30 1.6k
David Wittman United States 20 1.3k 0.8× 480 0.7× 421 0.9× 64 0.6× 227 2.0× 65 1.4k
M. Radovich Italy 24 1.7k 1.1× 774 1.1× 299 0.6× 48 0.4× 121 1.0× 102 1.8k
Anja von der Linden United States 27 2.5k 1.6× 1.1k 1.6× 644 1.4× 66 0.6× 100 0.9× 48 2.6k
S. Bardelli Italy 24 1.8k 1.1× 687 1.0× 671 1.4× 71 0.6× 65 0.6× 83 1.9k
Takashi Hamana Japan 21 1.2k 0.8× 499 0.7× 268 0.6× 90 0.8× 109 0.9× 52 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Taylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Taylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Taylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Taylor. The network helps show where James E. Taylor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James E. Taylor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James E. Taylor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James E. Taylor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James E. Taylor. James E. Taylor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Drakos, Nicole E., James E. Taylor, & Andrew Benson. (2025). Do assumptions about the central density of subhaloes affect dark matter annihilation and lensing calculations?. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2025(6). 49–49. 1 indexed citations
2.
Parker, Laura C., Stephen Gwyn, Ian Roberts, et al.. (2025). No Evidence of Asymmetrically Enhanced Star Formation in Infalling Galaxies in UNIONS. The Astrophysical Journal. 982(2). 120–120.
3.
Haggar, Roan, Federico De Luca, M. De Petris, et al.. (2024). Reconsidering the dynamical states of galaxy clusters using PCA and UMAP. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 532(1). 1031–1048. 2 indexed citations
4.
Taylor, James E., et al.. (2024). The infall region as a complementary probe to cluster abundance. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 532(2). 2521–2533. 3 indexed citations
5.
Haggar, Roan, et al.. (2024). Constraining Cosmological Parameters Using the Splashback Radius of Galaxy Clusters. The Astrophysical Journal. 972(1). 28–28. 4 indexed citations
6.
Drakos, Nicole E., et al.. (2023). Halo growth and merger rates as a cosmological test. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 527(2). 3459–3473. 6 indexed citations
7.
Taylor, James E., et al.. (2023). Testing the surface brightness fluctuation method on dwarf galaxies in the COSMOS field. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 527(2). 1656–1673.
8.
Drakos, Nicole E., et al.. (2019). Major mergers between dark matter haloes – I. Predictions for size, shape, and spin. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 487(1). 993–1007. 15 indexed citations
9.
Shan, Huanyuan, Jean‐Paul Kneib, Johan Comparat, et al.. (2014). Weak lensing mass map and peak statistics in Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope Stripe 82 survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 442(3). 2534–2542. 34 indexed citations
10.
Shan, Huanyuan, Jean‐Paul Kneib, Johan Comparat, et al.. (2013). Weak lensing mass map and peak statistics in CFHT/Stripe82 survey. arXiv (Cornell University).
11.
Finoguenov, A., R. Massey, Jason Rhodes, et al.. (2013). WEAK LENSING CALIBRATEDM-TSCALING RELATION OF GALAXY GROUPS IN THE COSMOS FIELD. The Astrophysical Journal. 778(1). 74–74. 20 indexed citations
12.
Ma, Yin-Zhe, James E. Taylor, & D. Scott. (2013). Independent constraints on local non-Gaussianity from the peculiar velocity and density fields. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 436(3). 2029–2037. 6 indexed citations
13.
Taylor, James E., R. Massey, Alexie Leauthaud, et al.. (2012). MEASURING THE GEOMETRY OF THE UNIVERSE FROM WEAK GRAVITATIONAL LENSING BEHIND GALAXY GROUPS IN THEHSTCOSMOS SURVEY. The Astrophysical Journal. 749(2). 127–127. 11 indexed citations
14.
Taylor, James E.. (2010). Dark Matter Halos from the Inside Out. Advances in Astronomy. 2011. 1–17. 9 indexed citations
15.
Leauthaud, Alexie, R. Massey, Jean‐Paul Kneib, et al.. (2007). Weak Gravitational Lensing with COSMOS: Galaxy Selection and Shape Measurements. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 172(1). 219–238. 196 indexed citations
16.
Bundy, Kevin, et al.. (2005). The Mass-Dependent Evolution of Field Galaxies. AAS. 207.
17.
Hooper, Dan, James E. Taylor, & Joseph Silk. (2004). Can supersymmetry naturally explain the positron excess?. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 69(10). 44 indexed citations
18.
Taylor, James E., Joseph Silk, & Arif Babul. (2004). Small-scale Substructure in Dark Matter Haloes: Where Does Galaxy Formation Come to an End?. Symposium - International Astronomical Union. 220. 91–98. 7 indexed citations
19.
Taylor, James E., et al.. (1979). COLD RECYCLING OF FAILED FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS WITH CEMENT. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 3 indexed citations
20.
Taylor, James E. & Suzanne M. Hamilton. (1972). Some tests of the Vaníček Method of spectral analysis. Astrophysics and Space Science. 17(2). 357–367. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Yen‐Ting Lin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by B. Guiderdoni Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by G. Covone Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by E. Semboloni Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by F. Stoehr Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David Wittman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Radovich Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anja von der Linden Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. Bardelli Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Takashi Hamana
Rankless by CCL
2026