Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The formation and evolution of galaxies within merging dark matter haloes*
19931.1k citationsGuinevere Kauffmann, Simon D. M. White et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of B. Guiderdoni's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Guiderdoni with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Guiderdoni more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Guiderdoni. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Guiderdoni. The network helps show where B. Guiderdoni may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Guiderdoni
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Guiderdoni.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Guiderdoni based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with B. Guiderdoni. B. Guiderdoni is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hashimoto, Takuya, Thibault Garel, B. Guiderdoni, et al.. (2017). The MUSEHubbleUltra Deep Field Survey. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 608. A10–A10.51 indexed citations
5.
Lagache, G., et al.. (2015). Towards a new modelling of gas flows in a semi-analytical model of galaxy formation and evolution. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).9 indexed citations
Guiderdoni, B. & Ajit Kembhavi. (1998). Starbursts Triggers, Nature, and Evolution Les Houches School, September 17-27, 1996. Springer eBooks.1 indexed citations
15.
Kunth, D., et al.. (1996). The interplay between massive star formation, the ISM and galaxy evolution. 11.58 indexed citations
16.
Kauffmann, Guinevere, B. Guiderdoni, & Simon D. M. White. (1994). Faint galaxy counts in a hierarchical universe. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 267(4). 981–999.59 indexed citations
17.
Guiderdoni, B. & B. Rocca‐Volmerange. (1991). The faint galaxy counts revisited in an Omega 0 = 1 universe. 252(2). 435–448.3 indexed citations
18.
Rocca‐Volmerange, B. & B. Guiderdoni. (1988). An atlas of synthetic spectra of galaxies.. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 75(1). 93–106.2 indexed citations
19.
Guiderdoni, B. & B. Rocca‐Volmerange. (1988). Apparent magnitudes of high-redshift galaxies in UBVRI and Space Telescope phototometric systems.. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 74(2). 185–210.1 indexed citations
20.
Guiderdoni, B. & B. Rocca‐Volmerange. (1985). Evolution of spiral galaxies in the Virgo cluster. I: Statistical analysis of HI deficiency and colors. 151(1). 108–120.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.