James E. T. Smith

1.8k citations
19 papers · 419 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

James E. T. Smith

18 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers

James E. T. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 210
  • Spectroscopy 69
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 33
  • Inorganic Chemistry 51
  • Catalysis 25
Replace Ming‐Liang Tan with:
Ming‐Liang Tan United States
David C. Patton United States
Joshua W. Hollett Canada
Jetze Sikkema Netherlands
Bernardo Zúñiga-Gutiérrez Mexico
Vaida Arcisauskaité United Kingdom
Simona Irrera Italy
Daniel Mejı́a-Rodrı́guez United States
Víctor Manuel Pérez García Spain
Marius Kadek Norway
James E. T. Smith relative to Ming‐Liang Tan United States Ming‐Liang Tan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Ming‐Liang Tan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. T. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. T. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. T. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. T. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. T. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. T. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. T. Smith. The network helps show where James E. T. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. T. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. T. Smith Line = papers co-authored together James E. T. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2017133
2 201971
3 201945
4 201629
5 201625
6 201717
7 201811
8 198411
9 202211
10 201611
11 197211
12 197010
13 20169
14 19709
15 20208
16 19704
17 19812
18 20222
19 20250

About James E. T. Smith

James E. T. Smith is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 19 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (4 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (3 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (3 papers), Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques (2 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (2 papers), Organophosphorus compounds synthesis (2 papers) and Quantum many-body systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (210 citations), Spectroscopy (69 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (33 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (51 citations) and Catalysis (25 citations). James E. T. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sandeep Sharma, Adam Holmes, Bastien Mussard, J. Mathias Weber, Shuang Xu, Steven M. George, Andrew S. Cavanagh, George H. Cady, Giuseppe Carleo and Guglielmo Mazzola. Their work appears in journals such as Inorganic Chemistry, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact