Countries citing papers authored by James E. Krier
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Krier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Krier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Krier more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Krier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Krier. The network helps show where James E. Krier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James E. Krier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James E. Krier.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James E. Krier based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James E. Krier. James E. Krier is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Krier, James E.. (2015). Of Property Rights and Rights to Property. eYLS (Yale Law School).
2.
Krier, James E.. (2009). Evolutionary Theory and the Origin of Property Rights. Cornell law review/The Cornell law quarterly. 95(1). 139.26 indexed citations
3.
Krier, James E., et al.. (2004). Public Ruses [Symposium: The Death of Poletown: The Future of Eminent Domain and Urban Development After County of Wayne v. Hathcock] (reprinted in 37 Land Use & Env’t L. Rev. 49 (2006)). 2004.1 indexed citations
4.
Krier, James E. & Stewart J. Schwab. (1997). The Cathedral at Twenty-Five: Citations and Impressions. eYLS (Yale Law School).1 indexed citations
Krier, James E.. (1996). Capture and Counteraction: Self-Help by Environmental Zealots. University of Richmond law review. 30(4). 1039–1054.5 indexed citations
7.
Krier, James E.. (1996). Risk and the Legal System. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 545(1). 176–183.2 indexed citations
8.
Krier, James E. & Stewart J. Schwab. (1995). Property Rules and Liability Rules: The Cathedral in Another Light. eYLS (Yale Law School).30 indexed citations
9.
Krier, James E.. (1995). On the Topology of Uniform Environmental Standards in a Federal System - and Why it Matters. Maryland law review. 54(4). 1226.3 indexed citations
10.
Krier, James E.. (1990). Risk and Design. The Journal of Legal Studies. 19(S2). 781–790.4 indexed citations
11.
Krier, James E.. (1989). The Political Economy of Barry Commoner. eYLS (Yale Law School).3 indexed citations
Stewart, Richard B. & James E. Krier. (1978). Environmental law and policy : readings, materials, and notes. eYLS (Yale Law School).7 indexed citations
15.
Krier, James E. & Richard A. Posner. (1974). Economic Analysis of Law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 122(6). 1664–1664.4 indexed citations
16.
Krier, James E. & W. David Montgomery. (1973). Resource allocation, information cost and the form of government intervention.. CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology).5 indexed citations
17.
Mashaw, Jerry L. & James E. Krier. (1973). Revealing the Secret Curriculum. Virginia Law Review. 59(1). 169–169.1 indexed citations
18.
LEES, LESTER, Robert C. Fisher, Burton H. Klein, et al.. (1972). Smog: a report to the people. CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology).3 indexed citations
19.
Krier, James E.. (1971). Environmental law and policy : readings, materials and notes on air pollution and related problems.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.