James E. Kinder

14 papers receiving 514 citations

Peers

James E. Kinder
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 76
  • Reproductive Medicine 55
  • Small Animals 27
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 23
  • Biomedical Engineering 98
Replace S.C. de Vries with:
S.C. de Vries Netherlands
Falk Richter Germany
Hans Langeveld Netherlands
Mirna Ivonne Gaya Scandiffio Brazil
Kingiri Senelwa Kenya
Susanne Paulrud Sweden
Yanyuan Bai China
Jiqing Fan United States
Gianfranco Airoldi Italy
Dolon Konwer India
James E. Kinder relative to S.C. de Vries Netherlands S.C. de Vries's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.7×
S.C. de Vries · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Kinder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Kinder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Kinder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Kinder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Kinder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Kinder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Kinder. The network helps show where James E. Kinder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Kinder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Kinder Line = papers co-authored together James E. Kinder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2019180
2 200996
3 197568
4 200149
5 199346
6 202236
7 197620
8 200212
9 19779
10 20187
11 19756
12 20224
13 19963
14 20252

About James E. Kinder

James E. Kinder is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Small Animals, Environmental Chemistry, Reproductive Medicine and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 14 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (4 papers), Smart Agriculture and AI (1 paper), Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (1 paper), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (1 paper), Biofuel production and bioconversion (1 paper), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (1 paper), Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies (1 paper) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (76 citations), Reproductive Medicine (55 citations), Small Animals (27 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (23 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (98 citations). James E. Kinder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Hamed Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Mona Dehhaghi, Thaddeus Chukwuemeka Ezeji, Jerry J. Reeves, V. Line Estergreen, Prabir Kumar Chakraborty, Terry J. Housh, Glen O. Johnson, Grahame J. Coleman and Rutu Y. Acharya. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Animals, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews and Environment Systems & Decisions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact