James E. Kath
Impact in
-
- Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Papers in
-
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 5
- DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry 2
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 2
- Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 1
- Genetics 5
- Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology 5
- Co-authors
- Joseph J. Loparo (5 shared papers)Mark D. Sutton (3 shared papers)Slobodan Jergic (3 shared papers)Nicholas E. Dixon (3 shared papers)Graham C. Walker (1 shared paper)Michael C. Jewett (2 shared papers)Jasmine M. Hershewe (2 shared papers)Elizabeth S. Thrall (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (3 papers)Nature Communications (1 paper)Biotechnology and Bioengineering (1 paper)Chemical Communications (1 paper)ACS Synthetic Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaNorway
In The Last Decade
James E. Kath
11 papers receiving 280 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Structural Biology 11
- Genetics 113
- Molecular Biology 260
- Molecular Medicine 13
- Biophysics 9
Countries citing papers authored by James E. Kath
This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Kath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Kath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Kath more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Kath
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Kath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Kath. The network helps show where James E. Kath may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Kath, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 77 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 65 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 1 |
About James E. Kath
James E. Kath is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Organic Chemistry, Structural Biology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 11 papers that have together received 281 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (5 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (5 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (2 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (2 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (1 paper), Silk-based biomaterials and applications (1 paper), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper) and Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (11 citations), Genetics (113 citations), Molecular Biology (260 citations), Molecular Medicine (13 citations) and Biophysics (9 citations). James E. Kath has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Joseph J. Loparo, Mark D. Sutton, Slobodan Jergic, Nicholas E. Dixon, Graham C. Walker, Michael C. Jewett, Jasmine M. Hershewe, Elizabeth S. Thrall, Thapakorn Jaroentomeechai and Jessica C. Stark. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Chemical Communications and ACS Synthetic Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.