James E. Carey

4.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
64 papers, 4.0k citations indexed

About

James E. Carey is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, James E. Carey has authored 64 papers receiving a total of 4.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Computational Mechanics, 20 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 15 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in James E. Carey's work include Laser Material Processing Techniques (20 papers), Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence (11 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers). James E. Carey is often cited by papers focused on Laser Material Processing Techniques (20 papers), Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence (11 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers). James E. Carey collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Italy. James E. Carey's co-authors include Eric Mazur, Catherine H. Crouch, Mengyan Shen, François Y. Génin, R. Younkin, C. M. Friend, Ming Zhou, Tommaso Baldacchini, Joshua A. Levinson and Jeffrey M. Warrender and has published in prestigious journals such as Nano Letters, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of Applied Physics.

In The Last Decade

James E. Carey

63 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Hit Papers

Superhydrophobic Surfaces Prepared by Microstructuring of... 2006 2026 2012 2019 2006 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James E. Carey United States 28 1.8k 1.5k 1.5k 1.3k 667 64 4.0k
K. Zimmer Germany 26 1.5k 0.8× 1.1k 0.7× 562 0.4× 653 0.5× 774 1.2× 277 2.9k
Shigeki Matsuo Japan 44 2.8k 1.6× 3.6k 2.4× 1.0k 0.7× 1.5k 1.1× 620 0.9× 196 6.1k
J. Noack Germany 17 1.2k 0.6× 1.2k 0.8× 698 0.5× 335 0.3× 964 1.4× 48 3.1k
Sergey Makarov Russia 42 1.1k 0.6× 2.3k 1.5× 1.8k 1.2× 2.6k 2.0× 616 0.9× 279 5.7k
Walter Perrie United Kingdom 34 1.4k 0.8× 1.3k 0.8× 483 0.3× 530 0.4× 692 1.0× 105 3.0k
Liang Yang China 29 408 0.2× 1.3k 0.8× 557 0.4× 353 0.3× 110 0.2× 81 2.7k
Shian Zhang China 27 589 0.3× 937 0.6× 537 0.4× 691 0.5× 347 0.5× 247 2.8k
Dae Won Moon South Korea 32 723 0.4× 608 0.4× 1.3k 0.9× 1.4k 1.0× 215 0.3× 190 3.5k
Guenther Paltauf Austria 32 943 0.5× 3.3k 2.2× 414 0.3× 336 0.3× 2.2k 3.3× 153 4.5k

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Carey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Carey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Carey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Carey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Carey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Carey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Carey. The network helps show where James E. Carey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James E. Carey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James E. Carey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James E. Carey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James E. Carey. James E. Carey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pralle, Martin U., et al.. (2021). Ultra low light CMOS image sensors. 7–7. 2 indexed citations
2.
Pralle, Martin U., et al.. (2015). IR CMOS: the digital nightvision solution to sub-1 mLux imaging. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9451. 945108–945108. 1 indexed citations
3.
Carey, James E., et al.. (2012). Silicon photodiodes with high photoconductive gain at room temperature. Optics Express. 20(5). 5518–5518. 37 indexed citations
4.
Pralle, Martin U., et al.. (2011). IR CMOS: ultrafast laser-enhanced silicon detection. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8012. 801222–801222. 7 indexed citations
5.
Carey, James E., Catherine H. Crouch, Mengyan Shen, & Eric Mazur. (2005). Visible and near-infrared responsivity of femtosecond-laser microstructured silicon photodiodes. Optics Letters. 30(14). 1773–1773. 278 indexed citations
6.
Carey, James E.. (2004). Femtosecond-laser microstructuring of silicon for novel optoelectronic devices. PhDT. 26 indexed citations
7.
Carey, James E. & Eric Mazur. (2004). High sensitivity silicon-based VIS/NIR photodetectors. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. 2. 6 indexed citations
8.
Carey, James E., et al.. (2003). Femtosecond-Laser-Assisted Microstructuring of Silicon Surfaces. Optics and Photonics News. 14(2). 32–32. 27 indexed citations
11.
Carey, James E., et al.. (1997). Simplifying the dosimetry of carbon-11-labeled radiopharmaceuticals.. PubMed. 38(4). 654–60. 7 indexed citations
12.
Newton, Rebecca, S. L. Phipps, Thomas P. Flanigan, et al.. (1996). Characterisation of Human 5‐Hydroxytryptamine2A and 5‐Hydroxytryptamine2C Receptors Expressed in the Human Neuroblastoma Cell Line SH‐SY5Y: Comparative Stimulation by Hallucinogenic Drugs. Journal of Neurochemistry. 67(6). 2521–2531. 40 indexed citations
13.
Carey, James E., et al.. (1995). Release of Patients Containing Therapeutic Dosages of Iodine-131 from Hospitals. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology. 23(3). 144–149. 11 indexed citations
14.
DaSilva, Jean N., et al.. (1994). Characterization of [11C]tetrabenazine as an in vivo radioligand for the vesicular monoamine transporter. Nuclear Medicine and Biology. 21(2). 151–156. 31 indexed citations
15.
Kearfott, Kimberlee J., et al.. (1992). Radiation Protection Design For a Clinical Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Suite. Health Physics. 63(5). 581–589. 19 indexed citations
16.
Kilbourn, Michael R., James E. Carey, Robert A. Koeppe, et al.. (1989). Biodistribution, dosimetry, metabolism and monkey PET studies of [18F]GBR 13119. Imaging the dopamine uptake system in vivo. International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation Part B Nuclear Medicine and Biology. 16(6). 569–576. 39 indexed citations
17.
Carey, James E., et al.. (1986). Determination of iodine-131 diagnostic dose for imaging metastatic thyroid cancer.. PubMed. 27(11). 1764–9. 20 indexed citations
18.
Sisson, James C., Brahm Shapiro, William H. Beierwaltes, et al.. (1983). Treatment of malignant pheochromocytoma with a new radiopharmaceutical.. PubMed. 96. 209–17. 47 indexed citations
19.
Koral, Kenneth F., Ronald S. Adler, James E. Carey, Robert C. Kline, & William H. Beierwaltes. (1982). Two‐orthogonal‐view method for quantification of rad dose to neck lesions in thyroid cancer therapy patients. Medical Physics. 9(4). 497–505. 7 indexed citations
20.
Swanson, Dennis P., Lee E. Brown, Robert C. Kline, et al.. (1981). Myocardial localization of radiolabeled meta-iodobenzylguanidine: an interspecies comparison. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026