James C. Pearson

622 citations
19 papers · 477 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

James C. Pearson

18 papers receiving 452 citations

Peers

James C. Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 121
  • Molecular Biology 311
  • Biotechnology 32
  • Dermatology 29
  • Spectroscopy 42
Replace Marc J. Ostro with:
Marc J. Ostro United States
Carol F. Kirchhoff United States
Teri Girtsman United States
Masayasu Kitagawa Japan
Frank Hatcher United States
Bjarne J. Kvam Italy
G Alth Austria
Horst Schwinn Germany
Irwin Oreskes United States
Sergei Pechenov United States
James C. Pearson relative to Marc J. Ostro United States Marc J. Ostro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Marc J. Ostro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James C. Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James C. Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James C. Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. Pearson. The network helps show where James C. Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside James C. Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James C. Pearson Line = papers co-authored together James C. Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1984134
2 198680
3 200063
4 198763
5 198637
6 199626
7 200321
8 198911
9 19959
10
Statistical Methods in Environmental Health
19938
11 19858
12 19953
13 19813
14 19963
15 19772
16 19862
17 20022
18 19821
19
Social control in the treatment of adolescents in residential care: a dilemma.
19751

About James C. Pearson

James C. Pearson is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Mechanics of Materials and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 477 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein purification and stability (4 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers), High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (2 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (2 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (2 papers), Quality and Supply Management (1 paper), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (1 paper) and Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (121 citations), Molecular Biology (311 citations), Biotechnology (32 citations), Dermatology (29 citations) and Spectroscopy (42 citations). James C. Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Christopher R. Lowe, Steven J. Burton, Yannis D. Clonis, Mark Elwood, Jonathan S. Nguyen‐Van‐Tam, Richard P. Gallagher, William S. Wood, George C. Vradis, Paul Morrill and Kenny Sproule. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Public Health, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vaccine and Journal of Biotechnology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact