James C. Knight
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Thomas NowotnySteve FurberTerrence C. StewartBrian MagerkoIllah NourbakhshPaul GrahamAndrew PhilippidesJames P. Turner
- Topics
- Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (19 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (16 papers)Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices (10 papers)
- Cited by
- Cognitive NeuroscienceCellular and Molecular NeuroscienceElectrical and Electronic Engineering
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
James C. Knight
26 papers receiving 347 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 236
- Cognitive Neuroscience 169
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 108
- Artificial Intelligence 94
- Social Psychology 33
Countries citing papers authored by James C. Knight
This map shows the geographic impact of James C. Knight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. Knight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. Knight more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James C. Knight
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. Knight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. Knight. The network helps show where James C. Knight may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James C. Knight
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James C. Knight. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James C. Knight based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James C. Knight. James C. Knight is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 54 | |
| 19 | 17 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About James C. Knight
James C. Knight is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 31 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (19 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (16 papers) and Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (169 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (108 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (236 citations). James C. Knight has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Nowotny, Steve Furber, Terrence C. Stewart, Brian Magerko, Illah Nourbakhsh, Paul Graham, Andrew Philippides, James P. Turner, Anders Lansner and Phil Husbands. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Current Biology and Cerebral Cortex.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.