James C. Barborak
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 5%
- Process Chemistry and Technology top 5%
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 5%
- Materials Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Maurice BrookhartFrancis C. RixJoseph M. DeSimoneR. PettitEdward C. SmithPaul von Ragué SchleyerMalcolm D. E. ForbesKevin Cann
- Topics
- Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (5 papers)Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (4 papers)Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
James C. Barborak
25 papers receiving 679 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Organic Chemistry 634
- Inorganic Chemistry 221
- Process Chemistry and Technology 149
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 98
- Materials Chemistry 78
Countries citing papers authored by James C. Barborak
This map shows the geographic impact of James C. Barborak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. Barborak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. Barborak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James C. Barborak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. Barborak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. Barborak. The network helps show where James C. Barborak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James C. Barborak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James C. Barborak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James C. Barborak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James C. Barborak. James C. Barborak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 255 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 56 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 58 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About James C. Barborak
James C. Barborak is a scholar working on Process Chemistry and Technology, Organic Chemistry and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 25 papers that have together received 727 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (5 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (4 papers) and Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (149 citations), Organic Chemistry (634 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (221 citations). James C. Barborak has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Maurice Brookhart, Francis C. Rix, Joseph M. DeSimone, R. Pettit, Edward C. Smith, Paul von Ragué Schleyer, Malcolm D. E. Forbes, Kevin Cann, Damien Guironnet and Cheng Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Macromolecules and Inorganic Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.