James B. Preston
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Neurology top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Co-authors
- Peter L. StrickGordon K. MoeJ.A. AbildskovP L StrickFrank YanowitzH. BurlingtonDavid WhitlockPaul D. Cheney
- Topics
- Motor Control and Adaptation (11 papers)Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (9 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James B. Preston
39 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.1k
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 892
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 526
- Neurology 474
- Biomedical Engineering 397
Countries citing papers authored by James B. Preston
This map shows the geographic impact of James B. Preston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James B. Preston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James B. Preston more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James B. Preston
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James B. Preston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James B. Preston. The network helps show where James B. Preston may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James B. Preston
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James B. Preston. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James B. Preston based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James B. Preston. James B. Preston is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 404 | |
| 2 | 146 | |
| 3 | 54 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 107 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 91 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 36 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 90 | |
| 16 | 44 | |
| 17 | 35 | |
| 18 | 53 | |
| 19 | The influence of thiosemicarbazide on electrical activity recorded in the anterior brain stem of the cat. | 2 |
| 20 | 13 |
About James B. Preston
James B. Preston is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Motor Control and Adaptation (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (9 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.1k citations), Neurology (474 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (892 citations). James B. Preston has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter L. Strick, Gordon K. Moe, J.A. Abildskov, P L Strick, Frank Yanowitz, H. Burlington, David Whitlock, Paul D. Cheney, Donald Kennedy and J. Hore. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation Research, The Journal of Comparative Neurology and Journal of Neurophysiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.