James Agin

444 total citations
30 papers, 116 citations indexed

About

James Agin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Food Science and Biotechnology. According to data from OpenAlex, James Agin has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 116 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Molecular Biology, 12 papers in Food Science and 10 papers in Biotechnology. Recurrent topics in James Agin's work include Identification and Quantification in Food (11 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (10 papers) and Biosensors and Analytical Detection (10 papers). James Agin is often cited by papers focused on Identification and Quantification in Food (11 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (10 papers) and Biosensors and Analytical Detection (10 papers). James Agin collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. James Agin's co-authors include Patrick Bird, Erin Crowley, David Goins, Markus Timke, Danièle Sohier, Markus Kostrzewa, Gongyi Shi, Robert P. Jechorek, Eric A. E. Garber and Jonathan Cloke and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of AOAC International and Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL.

In The Last Decade

James Agin

28 papers receiving 108 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James Agin United States 7 42 41 34 32 28 30 116
David Goins United States 8 47 1.1× 49 1.2× 31 0.9× 31 1.0× 23 0.8× 24 135
Erin Crowley United States 7 45 1.1× 54 1.3× 39 1.1× 40 1.3× 21 0.8× 28 125
Patrick Bird United States 8 53 1.3× 56 1.4× 45 1.3× 39 1.2× 22 0.8× 43 161
Morgan N. Schroeder United States 6 45 1.1× 88 2.1× 42 1.2× 11 0.3× 56 2.0× 11 161
Maria Balkey United States 6 46 1.1× 86 2.1× 46 1.4× 6 0.2× 40 1.4× 19 149
Stephanie Defibaugh-Chávez United States 6 45 1.1× 124 3.0× 36 1.1× 10 0.3× 33 1.2× 7 178
Mohammad Salma France 8 123 2.9× 111 2.7× 40 1.2× 16 0.5× 18 0.6× 15 240
Sjoerd Kuiling Netherlands 7 41 1.0× 37 0.9× 26 0.8× 5 0.2× 33 1.2× 13 112
Assia Saltykova Belgium 9 157 3.7× 66 1.6× 25 0.7× 18 0.6× 29 1.0× 11 220
Ashley Sabol United States 7 42 1.0× 119 2.9× 39 1.1× 7 0.2× 66 2.4× 10 172

Countries citing papers authored by James Agin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Agin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Agin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Agin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Agin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Agin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Agin. The network helps show where James Agin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Agin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Agin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Agin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Agin. James Agin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
8.
Lacorn, Markus, et al.. (2018). The Validation of the RIDA®QUICK Gliadin for AOAC Research Institute. Journal of AOAC International. 101(5). 1548–1557. 1 indexed citations
9.
Bird, Patrick, Erin Crowley, James Agin, et al.. (2018). Confirmation and Identification of Listeria monocytogenes, Listeria spp. and Other Gram-Positive Organisms by the Bruker MALDI Biotyper Method: Collaborative Study, First Action 2017.10. Journal of AOAC International. 101(5). 1610–1622. 12 indexed citations
10.
Sato, Mitsuharu, Damian Guang Wei Foo, Patrick Bird, et al.. (2018). The Validation of the VereBeef™ Detection Kit. Journal of AOAC International. 102(2). 508–524. 1 indexed citations
11.
Cerqueira, Laura, Carina Almeida, Nuno F. Azevedo, et al.. (2018). Validation of Biomode S.A. Probe4CronobacterTM for the Identification of Cronobacter spp.. Journal of AOAC International. 102(3). 855–864. 4 indexed citations
12.
Malsick, Lauren E., Michael Koeris, Erin Crowley, et al.. (2018). Validation of Workflow Changes, Phage Concentration and Reformatted Detection Threshold for the Sample6 DETECT/L™ Test: Level 3 Modification. Journal of AOAC International. 101(6). 1895–1904. 2 indexed citations
15.
Cloke, Jonathan, Michelle Swimley, Robert S. Tebbs, et al.. (2016). Validation of the Applied Biosystems RapidFinder Shiga Toxin–Producing E. coli (STEC) Detection Workflow. Journal of AOAC International. 99(6). 1537–1554. 6 indexed citations
17.
Cloke, Jonathan, et al.. (2015). Validation of the Thermo Scientific SureTect Escherichia coli O157:H7 Real-Time PCR Assay for Raw Beef and Produce Matrixes. Journal of AOAC International. 98(5). 1301–1314. 1 indexed citations
18.
19.
Dutta, Vikrant, et al.. (2014). DNAble® Molecular Detection Kit for Salmonella. Journal of AOAC International. 97(5). 1359–1373. 2 indexed citations
20.
Crowley, Erin, et al.. (2012). Evaluation of the VITEK 2 Gram Positive (GP) Microbial Identification Test Card: Collaborative Study. Journal of AOAC International. 95(5). 1425–1432. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026