James A. Nash
Impact in
-
- Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
- Microbiology top 10%
- Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
Papers in
-
- Religion, Ecology, and Ethics 4
-
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 3
- Co-authors
- Timothy E. Weaver (1 shared paper)Henry T. Akinbi (1 shared paper)Tiffany N.S. Ballard (1 shared paper)А. В. Кузнецова (2 shared papers)P.‐O. Schnell (2 shared papers)Maria Czyzyk-Krzeska (2 shared papers)Joan Conaway (1 shared paper)Yolanda Sánchez (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal for the Study of Religion Nature and Culture (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)The Journal of Immunology (1 paper)Interpretation A Journal of Bible and Theology (1 paper)Microscopy Research and Technique (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James A. Nash
9 papers receiving 406 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Cancer Research 124
- Microbiology 37
- Religious studies 31
- Endocrinology 19
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 18
Countries citing papers authored by James A. Nash
This map shows the geographic impact of James A. Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James A. Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James A. Nash more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James A. Nash
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James A. Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James A. Nash. The network helps show where James A. Nash may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside James A. Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 187 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 125 | |
| 3 | Loving Nature: Ecological Integrity and Christian Responsibility | 1991 | 77 |
| 4 | 2002 | 28 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 13 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 10 | |
| 7 | Environmental ethics and Christian humanism | 1996 | 5 |
| 8 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1993 | 1 |
About James A. Nash
James A. Nash is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Cancer Research, having authored 9 papers that have together received 449 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (4 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 papers), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (2 papers), Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (1 paper), Environmental Conservation and Management (1 paper), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper) and High Altitude and Hypoxia (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (124 citations), Microbiology (37 citations), Religious studies (31 citations), Endocrinology (19 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (18 citations). James A. Nash has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Timothy E. Weaver, Henry T. Akinbi, Tiffany N.S. Ballard, А. В. Кузнецова, P.‐O. Schnell, Maria Czyzyk-Krzeska, Joan Conaway, Yolanda Sánchez, Jarek Meller and Ronald Conaway. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for the Study of Religion Nature and Culture, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Journal of Immunology, Interpretation A Journal of Bible and Theology and Microscopy Research and Technique.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.