James A. Gould
- Surgery
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Pharmacology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation (6 papers)Medieval Philosophy and Theology (2 papers)Gender, Feminism, and Media (2 papers)
- Journals
- Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseJournal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical TherapyPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James A. Gould
36 papers receiving 204 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Surgery 97
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 97
- Biomedical Engineering 70
- Pharmacology 69
- Sociology and Political Science 30
Countries citing papers authored by James A. Gould
This map shows the geographic impact of James A. Gould's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James A. Gould with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James A. Gould more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James A. Gould
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James A. Gould. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James A. Gould. The network helps show where James A. Gould may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James A. Gould
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James A. Gould. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James A. Gould based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James A. Gould. James A. Gould is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Earning, Deserving, and the Catechism's Understanding of Grace | 1 |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | The golden rule | 3 |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Contemporary Philosophical Logic | 5 |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | Readings on logic | 3 |
| 17 | Contemporary political thought : issues in scope, value, and direction | 5 |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | Contemporary readings in logical theory | 20 |
| 20 | 4 |
About James A. Gould
James A. Gould is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Theoretical Computer Science and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 41 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation (6 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (2 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (97 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (6 citations) and Pharmacology (69 citations). James A. Gould has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include George J. Davies, Irving M. Copi, Nancy N. Thompson, Robert L. Larson and Jacob Needleman. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.