Jake Ormond

623 citations
10 papers · 366 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jake Ormond

10 papers receiving 364 citations

Peers

Jake Ormond
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 262
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 150
  • Neurology 35
  • Developmental Neuroscience 17
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 19
Replace Joseph L. Ransdell with:
Joseph L. Ransdell United States
Ernesto Gonzalez United States
Yuichiro Ishii Japan
Julia Ledderose Germany
Nicholas R. DeStefino United States
Giuliana Caronia United States
S. Lévy United States
Karen Plant United Kingdom
Kobi Wasner Germany
Gregory Hoge United States
Jake Ormond relative to Joseph L. Ransdell United States Joseph L. Ransdell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Joseph L. Ransdell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jake Ormond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jake Ormond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jake Ormond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jake Ormond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jake Ormond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jake Ormond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jake Ormond. The network helps show where Jake Ormond may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Jake Ormond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jake Ormond Line = papers co-authored together Jake Ormond links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 201164
2 201363
3 202255
4 200448
5 200941
6 201536
7 201126
8 201519
9 20239
10 20085

About Jake Ormond

Jake Ormond is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 10 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (10 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (1 paper) and Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (262 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (150 citations), Neurology (35 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (17 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (19 citations). Jake Ormond has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Melanie A. Woodin, John O’Keefe, Bruce L. McNaughton, Damian S. Shin, Leslie T. Buck, Matthew E. Pamenter, Vivek Mahadevan, David Ng, Evgueni A. Ivakine and Roderick R. McInnes. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, Nature, Neuron and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact