Jae Kwon Bae

858 citations
35 papers · 593 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jae Kwon Bae

31 papers receiving 538 citations

Peers

Jae Kwon Bae
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Accounting 126
  • Management Science and Operations Research 116
  • Economics and Econometrics 180
  • Information Systems and Management 44
  • Marketing 51
Replace Feng Xiong with:
Feng Xiong China
Sungbin Cho South Korea
Zhiyuan Chen China
Douglas Kline United States
Manojit Chattopadhyay India
Prajwal Eachempati India
Nahia Mourad United Arab Emirates
Dijana Oreški Croatia
Chuanmin Mi China
José Ignacio Peláez Spain
Jae Kwon Bae relative to Feng Xiong China Feng Xiong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×17.5×
Feng Xiong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jae Kwon Bae

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jae Kwon Bae's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jae Kwon Bae with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jae Kwon Bae more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jae Kwon Bae

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jae Kwon Bae. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jae Kwon Bae. The network helps show where Jae Kwon Bae may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Jae Kwon Bae, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jae Kwon Bae Line = papers co-authored together Jae Kwon Bae links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014252
2 201163
3 200759
4 201251
5 200924
6 202016
7 201216
8 200815
9 201010
10 20119
11 20159
12 20209
13 20098
14 20188
15 20108
16 20135
17
A Study on the Information Cascades Effects of the Offline WOM and Online Review
20104
18 20164
19 20143
20 20232

About Jae Kwon Bae

Jae Kwon Bae is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Accounting, Information Systems and Management and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 35 papers that have together received 593 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction (9 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (8 papers), Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques (8 papers), Data Mining Algorithms and Applications (6 papers), Stock Market Forecasting Methods (6 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (4 papers), Innovation in Digital Healthcare Systems (4 papers) and Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (126 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (116 citations), Economics and Econometrics (180 citations), Information Systems and Management (44 citations) and Marketing (51 citations). Jae Kwon Bae has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Byeonghwa Park, Sungbin Cho, Daewon Kim, Dae‐Won Kim, Namho Lee, Chulmo Koo, Jungwoo Lee and Kyung Jin. Their work appears in journals such as Expert Systems with Applications, Information Systems Frontiers, Journal of Convergence Information Technology, International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks and GLOBAL BUSINESS & FINANCE REVIEW.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact