Jae Huh

1.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
14 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Jae Huh is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Surgery and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jae Huh has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 10 papers in Surgery and 4 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Jae Huh's work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (13 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (8 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers). Jae Huh is often cited by papers focused on Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (13 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (8 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers). Jae Huh collaborates with scholars based in United States. Jae Huh's co-authors include Nadeem R. Abu‐Rustum, Yukio Sonoda, Douglas A. Levine, S. Dennis, Richard R. Barakat, Eric Eisenhauer, R.R. Barakat, D.S. Chi, J. Lang and Martee L. Hensley and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer and The Oncologist.

In The Last Decade

Jae Huh

14 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

What is the optimal goal of primary cytoreductive surgery for bulky stage IIIC epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC)?

2006 465 citations D.S. Chi, Eric Eisenhauer et al. Gynecologic Oncology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jae Huh United States	11	1.1k	852	571	152	152	14	1.2k
F. P. H. L. J. Dijkhuizen Netherlands	16	707 0.6×	405 0.5×	1.1k 1.9×	100 0.7×	111 0.7×	27	1.6k
Shashikant B. Lele United States	13	531 0.5×	255 0.3×	322 0.6×	123 0.8×	118 0.8×	29	699
Allison E. Axtell United States	9	724 0.7×	393 0.5×	605 1.1×	88 0.6×	81 0.5×	14	894
Jiheum Paek South Korea	18	501 0.5×	586 0.7×	793 1.4×	79 0.5×	123 0.8×	66	1.2k
A. Thoury France	16	423 0.4×	331 0.4×	329 0.6×	50 0.3×	125 0.8×	38	748
Santiago Domingo Spain	16	331 0.3×	322 0.4×	369 0.6×	75 0.5×	152 1.0×	74	776
Riccardo Viganò Italy	17	539 0.5×	327 0.4×	403 0.7×	102 0.7×	113 0.7×	29	856
Elisa Piovano Italy	14	363 0.3×	229 0.3×	386 0.7×	59 0.4×	108 0.7×	34	595
Scott E. Lentz United States	11	358 0.3×	236 0.3×	399 0.7×	72 0.5×	69 0.5×	34	605
Konstantin Zakashansky United States	12	296 0.3×	161 0.2×	366 0.6×	129 0.8×	102 0.7×	50	636

Countries citing papers authored by Jae Huh

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jae Huh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jae Huh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jae Huh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jae Huh

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jae Huh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jae Huh. The network helps show where Jae Huh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jae Huh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jae Huh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jae Huh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jae Huh. Jae Huh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

Barlin, Joyce N., Changhong Yu, Emily K. Hill, et al.. (2011). Nomogram for predicting 5-year disease-specific mortality after primary surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 125(1). 25–30. 53 indexed citations

Shih, Karin, Qin Zhou, Jae Huh, et al.. (2010). Risk factors for recurrence of ovarian borderline tumors. Gynecologic Oncology. 120(3). 480–484. 80 indexed citations

Shih, Karin, Qin Zhou, Carol Aghajanian, et al.. (2010). Patterns of recurrence and role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II–IV serous ovarian borderline tumors. Gynecologic Oncology. 119(2). 270–273. 25 indexed citations

Dennis, S., Oliver Zivanovic, Kimberly Levinson, et al.. (2010). The incidence of major complications after the performance of extensive upper abdominal surgical procedures during primary cytoreduction of advanced ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinomas. Gynecologic Oncology. 119(1). 38–42. 155 indexed citations

Chi, D.S., Oliver Zivanovic, Valentin Kolev, et al.. (2009). Nomogram for predicting 5-year survival after primary surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 27(15_suppl). 5523–5523. 1 indexed citations

Dennis, S., Rébécca Phaëton, Thomas J. Miner, et al.. (2009). A Prospective Outcomes Analysis of Palliative Procedures Performed for Malignant Intestinal Obstruction Due to Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. The Oncologist. 14(8). 835–839. 44 indexed citations

Dennis, S., Yukio Sonoda, Nadeem R. Abu‐Rustum, et al.. (2007). Nomogram for survival after primary surgery for bulky stage IIIC ovarian carcinoma. Gynecologic Oncology. 108(1). 191–194. 54 indexed citations

Eisenhauer, Eric, William P. Tew, Douglas A. Levine, et al.. (2007). Response and outcomes in elderly patients with stages IIIC–IV ovarian cancer receiving platinum–taxane chemotherapy. Gynecologic Oncology. 106(2). 381–387. 48 indexed citations

S., D., Eric Eisenhauer, J. Lang, et al.. (2007). What Is the Optimal Goal of Primary Cytoreductive Surgery for Bulky Stage IIIC Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma (EOC)?. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 62(2). 104–106. 11 indexed citations

10.

Eisenhauer, Eric, Nadeem R. Abu‐Rustum, Ennapadam Venkatraman, et al.. (2006). Identification of prognostic factors after positive second-look surgery in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Gynecologic Oncology. 102(1). 8–14. 7 indexed citations

11.

Chi, D.S., Eric Eisenhauer, J. Lang, et al.. (2006). What is the optimal goal of primary cytoreductive surgery for bulky stage IIIC epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC)?. Gynecologic Oncology. 103(2). 559–564. 465 indexed citations breakdown →

12.

Dennis, S., John P. Diaz, Jae Huh, et al.. (2006). Guidelines and selection criteria for secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with recurrent, platinum‐sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Cancer. 106(9). 1933–1939. 260 indexed citations

13.

Eisenhauer, Eric, Nadeem R. Abu‐Rustum, Ennapadam Venkatraman, et al.. (2006). Identification of Prognostic Factors After Positive Second-Look Surgery in Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 61(10). 641–642. 1 indexed citations

14.

Eitan, Ram, Douglas A. Levine, Yukio Sonoda, et al.. (2005). The clinical significance of malignant pleural effusions in patients with optimally debulked ovarian carcinoma. Cancer. 103(7). 1397–1401. 38 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact