Jacqueline Dols

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 788 citations indexed

About

Jacqueline Dols is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jacqueline Dols has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 788 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Molecular Biology, 5 papers in Physiology and 3 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Jacqueline Dols's work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers) and Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers). Jacqueline Dols is often cited by papers focused on Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers) and Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers). Jacqueline Dols collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Sweden. Jacqueline Dols's co-authors include Linda Partridge, Sebastian Grönke, Melissa Cabecinha, Sylvie Burnouf, Teresa Niccoli, Sarah Mizielinska, Charlotte Ridler, Oliver Hendrich, Elizabeth Fisher and Ione Woollacott and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Nature Communications and Current Biology.

In The Last Decade

Jacqueline Dols

8 papers receiving 783 citations

Hit Papers

C9orf72 repeat expansions cause neurodegeneration in Dros... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jacqueline Dols Germany 8 445 408 236 200 165 8 788
Yoshitsugu Adachi United Kingdom 11 511 1.1× 501 1.2× 324 1.4× 96 0.5× 200 1.2× 13 851
Vinay K. Godena United Kingdom 9 452 1.0× 543 1.3× 244 1.0× 172 0.9× 171 1.0× 9 886
Raffaella Klima Italy 14 592 1.3× 436 1.1× 308 1.3× 65 0.3× 106 0.6× 24 899
Lillian M. Daughrity United States 9 564 1.3× 740 1.8× 432 1.8× 223 1.1× 194 1.2× 12 1.1k
Tatyana A. Shelkovnikova United Kingdom 23 980 2.2× 597 1.5× 335 1.4× 149 0.7× 132 0.8× 45 1.3k
Jayanth Chandran United States 15 504 1.1× 609 1.5× 127 0.5× 167 0.8× 336 2.0× 18 1.1k
Allison Citro United States 5 720 1.6× 480 1.2× 233 1.0× 208 1.0× 142 0.9× 6 1.0k
Michael L. Coonfield United States 9 562 1.3× 553 1.4× 207 0.9× 110 0.6× 331 2.0× 12 1.2k
Peter Karsten Germany 8 338 0.8× 254 0.6× 97 0.4× 97 0.5× 168 1.0× 8 643
Valérie Bercier Belgium 10 417 0.9× 546 1.3× 364 1.5× 77 0.4× 121 0.7× 16 794

Countries citing papers authored by Jacqueline Dols

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jacqueline Dols's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacqueline Dols with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacqueline Dols more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jacqueline Dols

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacqueline Dols. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacqueline Dols. The network helps show where Jacqueline Dols may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jacqueline Dols

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jacqueline Dols. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jacqueline Dols based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jacqueline Dols. Jacqueline Dols is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Burnouf, Sylvie, Oyinkan Sofola-Adesakin, Jacqueline Dols, et al.. (2017). Pseudo-acetylation of multiple sites on human Tau proteins alters Tau phosphorylation and microtubule binding, and ameliorates amyloid beta toxicity. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 9984–9984. 27 indexed citations
2.
Burnouf, Sylvie, et al.. (2016). Acetylation mimic of lysine 280 exacerbates human Tau neurotoxicity in vivo. Scientific Reports. 6(1). 22685–22685. 62 indexed citations
3.
Burnouf, Sylvie, Sebastian Grönke, Hrvoje Augustin, et al.. (2016). Deletion of endogenous Tau proteins is not detrimental in Drosophila. Scientific Reports. 6(1). 23102–23102. 34 indexed citations
4.
Niccoli, Teresa, Melissa Cabecinha, Anna Tillmann, et al.. (2016). Increased Glucose Transport into Neurons Rescues Aβ Toxicity in Drosophila. Current Biology. 26(18). 2550–2550. 13 indexed citations
5.
Bratić, Ana, Timo E.S. Kauppila, Bertil Macao, et al.. (2015). Complementation between polymerase- and exonuclease-deficient mitochondrial DNA polymerase mutants in genomically engineered flies. Nature Communications. 6(1). 8808–8808. 48 indexed citations
6.
Burnouf, Sylvie, et al.. (2015). Aβ43 is neurotoxic and primes aggregation of Aβ40 in vivo. Acta Neuropathologica. 130(1). 35–47. 37 indexed citations
7.
Buschmann, Henrik, Jacqueline Dols, Eduardo José Peña, et al.. (2015). Arabidopsis KCBP interacts with AIR9 but stays in the cortical division zone throughout mitosis via its MyTH4-FERM domain. Journal of Cell Science. 128(11). 2033–2046. 57 indexed citations
8.
Mizielinska, Sarah, Sebastian Grönke, Teresa Niccoli, et al.. (2014). C9orf72 repeat expansions cause neurodegeneration in Drosophila through arginine-rich proteins. Science. 345(6201). 1192–1194. 510 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026