Jacqueline Adams
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Genetics
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- R. J. TrentJohn RawlesK JenningsSteven A. WaltonThomas W. RedpathJohn DeanF. W. SmithMelissa Brooks
- Topics
- Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (5 papers)Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (2 papers)Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicinePulmonary and Respiratory MedicineRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Jacqueline Adams
16 papers receiving 319 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 211
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 112
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 74
- Genetics 67
- Surgery 58
Countries citing papers authored by Jacqueline Adams
This map shows the geographic impact of Jacqueline Adams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacqueline Adams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacqueline Adams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jacqueline Adams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacqueline Adams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacqueline Adams. The network helps show where Jacqueline Adams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jacqueline Adams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jacqueline Adams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jacqueline Adams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jacqueline Adams. Jacqueline Adams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 30 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 71 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 59 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 6 |
About Jacqueline Adams
Jacqueline Adams is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (5 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (2 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (211 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (112 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (74 citations). Jacqueline Adams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include R. J. Trent, John Rawles, K Jennings, Steven A. Walton, Thomas W. Redpath, John Dean, F. W. Smith, Melissa Brooks, Faheem Ahmad and David M. Cognetti. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Thorax and American Heart Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.