Jacob C. Dean

37 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Jacob C. Dean
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 336
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 757
  • Spectroscopy 390
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 203
  • Biophysics 61
Replace Debashree Ghosh with:
Debashree Ghosh India
Yu Harabuchi Japan
Anouk M. Rijs Netherlands
Adam S. Chatterley United Kingdom
Horst‐Dieter Försterling Germany
Nađa Došlić Croatia
Chris T. Middleton United States
Asier Longarte Spain
Juan J. Nogueira Spain
Matthias Ruckenbauer Austria
Jacob C. Dean relative to Debashree Ghosh India Debashree Ghosh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Debashree Ghosh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jacob C. Dean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jacob C. Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacob C. Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacob C. Dean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jacob C. Dean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacob C. Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacob C. Dean. The network helps show where Jacob C. Dean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jacob C. Dean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jacob C. Dean Line = papers co-authored together Jacob C. Dean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20231
3 20213
4 20187
5 201815
6 201764
7 2017149
8 201732
9 201646
10 201654
11 2016114
12 201670
13 201559
14 201416
15 2014122
16 201345
17 201255
18
TO TWEET OR NOT TO TWEET: TWITTER, “BROADCASTING,” AND FEDERAL RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 53
20111
19 201131
20 201176

About Jacob C. Dean

Jacob C. Dean is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Molecular Biology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (16 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (11 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (7 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (6 papers), Plant Gene Expression Analysis (5 papers), Lignin and Wood Chemistry (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (4 papers) and Protein Structure and Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (336 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (757 citations), Spectroscopy (390 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (203 citations) and Biophysics (61 citations). Jacob C. Dean has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gregory D. Scholes, Timothy S. Zwier, Daniel G. Oblinsky, Shahnawaz R. Rather, Evan G. Buchanan, Patrick S. Walsh, Zi S. D. Toa, Tihana Mirkovic, Chanelle C. Jumper and Elsa Cassette. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026