Jack F. Fowler
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 0.5%
- Radiation top 0.05%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 0.5%
- Surgery top 5%
- Oncology top 5%
- Co-authors
- J. DenekampWolfgang A. ToméRick ChappellM.V. WilliamsChristopher R. KingMinesh P. MehtaP.W. SheldonMark A. Ritter
- Topics
- Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (58 papers)Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (48 papers)Effects of Radiation Exposure (42 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Jack F. Fowler
146 papers receiving 6.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 3.6k
- Radiation 3.1k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 2.6k
- Surgery 1.0k
- Oncology 824
Countries citing papers authored by Jack F. Fowler
This map shows the geographic impact of Jack F. Fowler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack F. Fowler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack F. Fowler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jack F. Fowler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack F. Fowler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack F. Fowler. The network helps show where Jack F. Fowler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jack F. Fowler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jack F. Fowler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jack F. Fowler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jack F. Fowler. Jack F. Fowler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 46 | |
| 3 | 179 | |
| 4 | 225 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 118 | |
| 7 | 106 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 105 | |
| 11 | 38 | |
| 12 | 40 | |
| 13 | 51 | |
| 14 | 39 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 122 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | Dose fractionation schedules--biologic aspects and applications to high LET radiotherapy. | 2 |
| 20 | A reply: detecting ability of radioisotope imaging devices. | 1 |
About Jack F. Fowler
Jack F. Fowler is a scholar working on Radiation, Otorhinolaryngology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 149 papers that have together received 6.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (58 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (48 papers) and Effects of Radiation Exposure (42 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (3.1k citations), Otorhinolaryngology (642 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (2.6k citations). Jack F. Fowler has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include J. Denekamp, Wolfgang A. Tomé, Rick Chappell, M.V. Williams, Christopher R. King, Minesh P. Mehta, P.W. Sheldon, Mark A. Ritter, James S. Welsh and David J. Brenner. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, The Lancet and The Astrophysical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.