J. W. Bristow
- Geophysics top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Geochemistry and Petrology top 10%
- Geology top 10%
- Paleontology top 10%
- Co-authors
- W. CompstonIan S. WilliamsCraig B. SmithC. Stewart EldridgeErika S. BartonJ. W. HarrisD. K. HallbauerH. L. Allsopp
- Topics
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis (15 papers)Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (12 papers)Geological and Geophysical Studies (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- South AfricaAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
J. W. Bristow
25 papers receiving 475 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Geophysics 399
- Artificial Intelligence 202
- Geochemistry and Petrology 75
- Geology 51
- Paleontology 46
Countries citing papers authored by J. W. Bristow
This map shows the geographic impact of J. W. Bristow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. W. Bristow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. W. Bristow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. W. Bristow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. W. Bristow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. W. Bristow. The network helps show where J. W. Bristow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. W. Bristow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. W. Bristow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. W. Bristow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. W. Bristow. J. W. Bristow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 24 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 52 | |
| 6 | An Overview of the Regulation Issues | 2 |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | Setting, geochronology and geochemical characteristics of 1600 m.y. kimberlites and related rocks from the Kuruman Province, South Africa | 5 |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | Updating dating down under | 0 |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | Rb-Sr geochronology of some Miocene West Australian lamproites | 7 |
| 15 | Proterozoic kimberlites and lamproites and a preliminary age for the Argyle lamproite pipe, Western Australia | 19 |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | Personnel in change : organization development through the personnel function | 1 |
About J. W. Bristow
J. W. Bristow is a scholar working on Archeology, Geology and Geophysics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 511 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (15 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (12 papers) and Geological and Geophysical Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (399 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (75 citations) and Geology (51 citations). J. W. Bristow has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include W. Compston, Ian S. Williams, Craig B. Smith, C. Stewart Eldridge, Erika S. Barton, J. W. Harris, D. K. Hallbauer, H. L. Allsopp, P.E. Irving and E. M. W. Skinner. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Chemical Geology and Economic Geology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.